The museum · US
The 2000s room
An illustrated way in
Explore the house
Choose an object to open its source. The house brings separate observations together; it is not a reconstructed household.
Homeownership rate, 2000 Food basket and expenditure breakdown, 2005 (CEX) Complete plumbing facilities, 2000 House heating fuel, 2009 (RECS) Air conditioning, 2009 (RECS) Households with cable TV, 2006 Internet and broadband adoption, 2000s Households with at least one vehicle, 2000
The composite family. Each room is a statistical composite, assembled from separate distributions with separate sources. The family at the median income did not also have the median house, the median car, and the median diet. No single family described here ever existed; each fact tells you, in its provenance drawer, which real population it was measured from.
About this selection · Guided room
A selected route introduces this room's records. Its sources describe different populations; the route does not reconstruct a single household.
This describes how the page is arranged; it is not an evidence score.
Explore the objects with full labels 8 source-linked subjects
Objects & everyday life
A closer look
Each label names its measurement and date. Drawings identify subjects, not exact appliance models.
Homeownership rate, 200066.2%Open source record ↗Food basket and expenditure breakdown, 2005 (CEX)Food $8,622/yr (13.9% of expenditure). Food at home $4,846 (56% of food), food away from home $3,776 (44%). K…Open source record ↗Complete plumbing facilities, 2000~99.5% of homes had complete plumbing (~0.5% lacked)Open source record ↗House heating fuel, 2009 (RECS)Natural gas 49%, electricity 34%, fuel oil 6%, propane 5%, other 6%Open source record ↗Air conditioning, 2009 (RECS)87% of homes had AC (61% central AC)Open source record ↗Households with cable TV, 200665.3 million basic cable subscribers (~59% of TV households)Open source record ↗Internet and broadband adoption, 2000sInternet: 46% (2000) → 79% (2009). Broadband: ~5% (2000) → 63% (2009).Open source record ↗Households with at least one vehicle, 200089.7% (10.3% with no vehicle); avg 1.9 vehicles per householdOpen source record ↗
Follow a tour: The work that moved
Inspect the evidence
Browse the records
Every observation includes its measured population and source. Calculations identify their inputs; gaps explain what remains unavailable or unverified.
- Recorded observations
- 62
- Calculated exhibits
- 1
- Documented gaps
- 0
These are counts of collection entries, not people or households. Observations exclude gaps; calculated exhibits are counted separately. A gap is an unanswered or unverified item, not a zero value.
The home
7 observations · 0 gaps66.2%A
Homeownership rate, 2000observed record
% of occupied dwelling units (owner-occupied)
Population measuredAll U.S. occupied housing units (decennial census)
Source recordU.S. Census Bureau · 2000 · Tier A
Full record
Homeownership Rate by State: 1900 to 2000
U.S. Census Bureau, 2000 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Curator note: From Census Bureau decennial time series (owner.pdf). Up from 64.2% in 1990. The housing bubble would push homeownership to a peak of ~69% in 2004-2006 before the Great Recession.
Source note: Time series of homeownership rates from 1900 to 2000 by state and nationally. 1950 national rate: 55.0%. 1940: 43.6%. 1960: 61.9%. Also see companion table: https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/decennial/tables/time-series/census-housing-tables/ownerchar.pdf
Assumption: The composite family
U.S. Census Bureau, 2000 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Curator note: From Census Bureau decennial time series (owner.pdf). Up from 64.2% in 1990. The housing bubble would push homeownership to a peak of ~69% in 2004-2006 before the Great Recession.
Source note: Time series of homeownership rates from 1900 to 2000 by state and nationally. 1950 national rate: 55.0%. 1940: 43.6%. 1960: 61.9%. Also see companion table: https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/decennial/tables/time-series/census-housing-tables/ownerchar.pdf
Assumption: The composite family
$119,600A
Median value of owner-occupied homes, 2000observed record
USD, nominal
Population measuredOwner-occupied housing units, median value (decennial census, nominal/unadjusted dollars), U.S. and by state
Source recordU.S. Census Bureau · 2000 · Tier A
Full record
Historical Census of Housing Tables: Home Values (Unadjusted)
U.S. Census Bureau, 2000 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Basis: One-time price
Affordability anchors: Production and nonsupervisory employees, total private sector; All US families by family size (2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7+ persons), CPS money income
Denominators measure: hours axis: average hourly earnings; income axis: total money income
Curator note: From Census Historical Housing Tables (values-unadj.txt). Up from $79,100 in 1990. The housing bubble would drive values far higher by 2006-07 before the crash.
Source note: Median value of owner-occupied homes, unadjusted (nominal) dollars, decennial 1940-2000. National medians: 1940 $2,938; 1950 $7,354; 1960 $11,900; 1970 $17,000; 1980 $47,200; 1990 $79,100; 2000 $119,600. Companion to the Census homeownership history table (census-homeownership-historical); distinct table (values, not rates). Modern values (2010+) come from ACS B25077 (census-acs-homevalue).
Assumption: Values are shown in period money
U.S. Census Bureau, 2000 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Basis: One-time price
Affordability anchors: Production and nonsupervisory employees, total private sector; All US families by family size (2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7+ persons), CPS money income
Denominators measure: hours axis: average hourly earnings; income axis: total money income
Curator note: From Census Historical Housing Tables (values-unadj.txt). Up from $79,100 in 1990. The housing bubble would drive values far higher by 2006-07 before the crash.
Source note: Median value of owner-occupied homes, unadjusted (nominal) dollars, decennial 1940-2000. National medians: 1940 $2,938; 1950 $7,354; 1960 $11,900; 1970 $17,000; 1980 $47,200; 1990 $79,100; 2000 $119,600. Companion to the Census homeownership history table (census-homeownership-historical); distinct table (values, not rates). Modern values (2010+) come from ACS B25077 (census-acs-homevalue).
Assumption: Values are shown in period money
Computed affordability
≈ 8,537 hours of work
≈ 190.8% of annual income
Large ratio: inspect the wage population and anchor years in provenance before reading this as one household's timeline.
~99.5% of homes had complete plumbing (~0.5% lacked)A
Complete plumbing facilities, 2000observed record
% of occupied housing units
Population measuredAll occupied housing units in the United States (decennial census)
Source recordU.S. Census Bureau · 2000 · Tier A
Full record
Historical Census of Housing Tables: Plumbing
U.S. Census Bureau, 2000 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Curator note: From Census Historical Housing Tables: Plumbing. Estimated from the series: 1990: 1% lacked, approaching 0% by 2000. Plumbing was universally available.
Source note: Complete plumbing = hot and cold piped water + flush toilet + bathtub/shower for exclusive use. Lacked complete plumbing (US row of plumbing-tab.txt, verified 2026-07-07): 1940 45.3%, 1950 35.5%, 1960 16.8%, 1970 6.9%, 1980 2.7%, 1990 1.1%. Exact data file: https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/decennial/tables/time-series/coh-plumbing/plumbing-tab.txt. The 1940 Census of Housing was the first to ask about plumbing.
U.S. Census Bureau, 2000 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Curator note: From Census Historical Housing Tables: Plumbing. Estimated from the series: 1990: 1% lacked, approaching 0% by 2000. Plumbing was universally available.
Source note: Complete plumbing = hot and cold piped water + flush toilet + bathtub/shower for exclusive use. Lacked complete plumbing (US row of plumbing-tab.txt, verified 2026-07-07): 1940 45.3%, 1950 35.5%, 1960 16.8%, 1970 6.9%, 1980 2.7%, 1990 1.1%. Exact data file: https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/decennial/tables/time-series/coh-plumbing/plumbing-tab.txt. The 1940 Census of Housing was the first to ask about plumbing.
Natural gas 49%, electricity 34%, fuel oil 6%, propane 5%, other 6%A
House heating fuel, 2009 (RECS)observed record
% of homes using each fuel as main space heating source
Population measuredU.S. housing units (sampled)
Source recordU.S. Energy Information Administration · 2020 · Tier A
Full record
Residential Energy Consumption Survey (RECS)
U.S. Energy Information Administration, 2020 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Curator note: From the 2009 RECS. Natural gas remained the dominant heating fuel but was declining (from 51% in 2005). Electricity continued its long-term rise (from 29% in 2005 to 34% in 2009). Fuel oil was down to ~6% (from 10%+ in 1993), concentrated in the Northeast. Coal was gone as a heating fuel. Source: EIA RECS 2009.
Source note: Started 1978, triennial/quadrennial. Tracks appliance ownership (refrigerator, washing machine, air conditioning) and housing characteristics. AC diffusion: 1993 RECS 68%, 2009 RECS 87%, 2015 RECS 87%. Useful for diffusion and home panels as complement to AHS.
U.S. Energy Information Administration, 2020 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Curator note: From the 2009 RECS. Natural gas remained the dominant heating fuel but was declining (from 51% in 2005). Electricity continued its long-term rise (from 29% in 2005 to 34% in 2009). Fuel oil was down to ~6% (from 10%+ in 1993), concentrated in the Northeast. Coal was gone as a heating fuel. Source: EIA RECS 2009.
Source note: Started 1978, triennial/quadrennial. Tracks appliance ownership (refrigerator, washing machine, air conditioning) and housing characteristics. AC diffusion: 1993 RECS 68%, 2009 RECS 87%, 2015 RECS 87%. Useful for diffusion and home panels as complement to AHS.
2,057 sq ft (new construction)A
Median square footage of new single-family homes, 2000observed record
median square feet of floor area, new single-family houses completed
Population measuredNew single-family houses completed in the United States
Source recordU.S. Census Bureau · 2024 · Tier A
Full record
Characteristics of New Single-Family Houses Completed (Census C-25 / Series H-150)
U.S. Census Bureau, 2024 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Curator note: From the Census Bureau's Survey of Construction (C-25 annual report). New homes crossed 2,000 sq ft in 1998 (2,000) and continued rising through the housing boom: 2005 peaked at 2,227 before the crash. 2009 fell to 2,135 (recession). By 2010: 2,169. Source: c25ann2009.pdf.
Source note: Annual data on median square feet of floor area in new single-family houses completed, from the Census Bureau's Survey of Construction (SOC). Data available 1973-present. The C-25 annual reports (c25ann2003.pdf through c25ann2017.pdf) and H-150 reports (h150-73A.pdf through h150-89.pdf) are archived in vitrine-research/20-census-construction/. They contain the historical table 'Median and Average Square Feet of Floor Area in New Single-Family Houses Completed.' Pre-1999 reports use Series H-150 designation. Note: this measures NEW construction only, not the existing housing stock — the AHS measures the entire stock and yields lower medians because older, smaller homes remain in the inventory.
U.S. Census Bureau, 2024 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Curator note: From the Census Bureau's Survey of Construction (C-25 annual report). New homes crossed 2,000 sq ft in 1998 (2,000) and continued rising through the housing boom: 2005 peaked at 2,227 before the crash. 2009 fell to 2,135 (recession). By 2010: 2,169. Source: c25ann2009.pdf.
Source note: Annual data on median square feet of floor area in new single-family houses completed, from the Census Bureau's Survey of Construction (SOC). Data available 1973-present. The C-25 annual reports (c25ann2003.pdf through c25ann2017.pdf) and H-150 reports (h150-73A.pdf through h150-89.pdf) are archived in vitrine-research/20-census-construction/. They contain the historical table 'Median and Average Square Feet of Floor Area in New Single-Family Houses Completed.' Pre-1999 reports use Series H-150 designation. Note: this measures NEW construction only, not the existing housing stock — the AHS measures the entire stock and yields lower medians because older, smaller homes remain in the inventory.
$602/monthA
Median gross rent, 2000observed record
USD, nominal (median gross rent, specified renter-occupied housing units paying cash rent)
Population measuredAll specified renter-occupied housing units in the United States paying cash rent
Source recordU.S. Census Bureau · 2000 · Tier A
Full record
Historical Census of Housing Tables: Gross Rents
U.S. Census Bureau, 2000 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Curator note: From Census Historical Housing Tables: Gross Rents (grossrents-unadj.txt). Up from $447 in 1990. Cross-verified: NHGIS 2000 block-group-level data (208,790 BGs) shows median-of-BG-medians of $561, consistent with the Census national figure of $602.
Source note: National and state median gross rent from the Census of Housing, 1940-2000. Files: grossrents-unadj.txt (nominal), grossrents-adj.txt (CPI-U-RS adjusted to 2000 dollars). Cross-verified against NHGIS national-level data (1980: $199 contract rent STF1, $243 gross rent STF4Hb; 1990: $447 FA4001 STF4b). URL CORRECTION 2026-07-28: the registered direct-PDF link (www2.census.gov .../housing/grossrents.pdf) 404s; repointed at the table's landing page, which links the same files.
U.S. Census Bureau, 2000 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Curator note: From Census Historical Housing Tables: Gross Rents (grossrents-unadj.txt). Up from $447 in 1990. Cross-verified: NHGIS 2000 block-group-level data (208,790 BGs) shows median-of-BG-medians of $561, consistent with the Census national figure of $602.
Source note: National and state median gross rent from the Census of Housing, 1940-2000. Files: grossrents-unadj.txt (nominal), grossrents-adj.txt (CPI-U-RS adjusted to 2000 dollars). Cross-verified against NHGIS national-level data (1980: $199 contract rent STF1, $243 gross rent STF4Hb; 1990: $447 FA4001 STF4b). URL CORRECTION 2026-07-28: the registered direct-PDF link (www2.census.gov .../housing/grossrents.pdf) 404s; repointed at the table's landing page, which links the same files.
Natural gas 55.2%, electricity 29.0%, fuel oil 7.5%, LPG 4.7%, wood 1.9%, kerosene 0.7%A
House heating fuel, 2001 (RECS)observed record
% of U.S. households using each fuel as main space heating source
Population measuredU.S. housing units (sampled)
Source recordU.S. Energy Information Administration · 2020 · Tier A
Full record
Residential Energy Consumption Survey (RECS)
U.S. Energy Information Administration, 2020 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Curator note: From the 2001 RECS, Table HC3-1b. 107.0 million total households. Natural gas: 59.3M (55.2%). Electricity: 31.1M (29.0%) — including heat pumps. Fuel oil: 8.0M (7.5%). LPG: 5.0M (4.7%). Wood: 2.0M (1.9%). Kerosene: 0.8M (0.7%). Source: recs-2001-alltables.pdf, Table HC1-1a and recs-2001-hc3.pdf, Table HC3-1b.
Source note: Started 1978, triennial/quadrennial. Tracks appliance ownership (refrigerator, washing machine, air conditioning) and housing characteristics. AC diffusion: 1993 RECS 68%, 2009 RECS 87%, 2015 RECS 87%. Useful for diffusion and home panels as complement to AHS.
Assumption: The composite family
U.S. Energy Information Administration, 2020 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Curator note: From the 2001 RECS, Table HC3-1b. 107.0 million total households. Natural gas: 59.3M (55.2%). Electricity: 31.1M (29.0%) — including heat pumps. Fuel oil: 8.0M (7.5%). LPG: 5.0M (4.7%). Wood: 2.0M (1.9%). Kerosene: 0.8M (0.7%). Source: recs-2001-alltables.pdf, Table HC1-1a and recs-2001-hc3.pdf, Table HC3-1b.
Source note: Started 1978, triennial/quadrennial. Tracks appliance ownership (refrigerator, washing machine, air conditioning) and housing characteristics. AC diffusion: 1993 RECS 68%, 2009 RECS 87%, 2015 RECS 87%. Useful for diffusion and home panels as complement to AHS.
Assumption: The composite family
The budget
12 observations · 0 gaps$50,730A
Median family income, all families, 2000observed record
USD per year, nominal
Population measuredAll US families by family size (2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7+ persons), CPS money income
Source recordU.S. Census Bureau · 2025 · Tier A
Full record
Census Historical Income Table F-8: Families by Size and Median and Mean Income (All Races)
U.S. Census Bureau, 2025 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Curator note: From Census F-8. All families: 73,780 thousand, median $50,730 ($86,740 in 2024 dollars). The peak of the 1990s boom. The 2000s would see stagnant real median income — the Great Recession (2007-09) would push it down.
Source note: Excel file (f08ar = All Races). The 4-person-family section is the primary source for the museum's family-of-four medians. Coverage window starts at 1947 — verify the 4-person column covers the full window. CORRECTION 2026-07-13: this source was registered with the f08a.xlsx URL, which is the ASIAN-families table (sections 'Asian Alone or in Combination'/'Asian Alone', 2002-2020 only); every transcribed value re-verified against the fetched f08ar.xlsx (All Families 2024 row 10: $105,800 median/$144,500 mean; 1950 row 86: $3,319 current/$35,290 in 2024$; Four People 2024 row 259: $139,900). Race variants: f08w (White), f08b (Black), f08h (Hispanic), f08wnh (White not Hispanic), f08a (Asian).
Assumption: The composite family
Assumption: Values are shown in period money
U.S. Census Bureau, 2025 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Curator note: From Census F-8. All families: 73,780 thousand, median $50,730 ($86,740 in 2024 dollars). The peak of the 1990s boom. The 2000s would see stagnant real median income — the Great Recession (2007-09) would push it down.
Source note: Excel file (f08ar = All Races). The 4-person-family section is the primary source for the museum's family-of-four medians. Coverage window starts at 1947 — verify the 4-person column covers the full window. CORRECTION 2026-07-13: this source was registered with the f08a.xlsx URL, which is the ASIAN-families table (sections 'Asian Alone or in Combination'/'Asian Alone', 2002-2020 only); every transcribed value re-verified against the fetched f08ar.xlsx (All Families 2024 row 10: $105,800 median/$144,500 mean; 1950 row 86: $3,319 current/$35,290 in 2024$; Four People 2024 row 259: $139,900). Race variants: f08w (White), f08b (Black), f08h (Hispanic), f08wnh (White not Hispanic), f08a (Asian).
Assumption: The composite family
Assumption: Values are shown in period money
$62,670A
Median family income, four-person families, 2000observed record
USD per year, nominal
Population measuredAll US families by family size (2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7+ persons), CPS money income
Source recordU.S. Census Bureau · 2025 · Tier A
Full record
Census Historical Income Table F-8: Families by Size and Median and Mean Income (All Races)
U.S. Census Bureau, 2025 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Basis: Annual figure
Curator note: From Census F-8. 4-person families: median $62,670 ($107,200 in 2024 dollars). Average family size: 3.14.
Source note: Excel file (f08ar = All Races). The 4-person-family section is the primary source for the museum's family-of-four medians. Coverage window starts at 1947 — verify the 4-person column covers the full window. CORRECTION 2026-07-13: this source was registered with the f08a.xlsx URL, which is the ASIAN-families table (sections 'Asian Alone or in Combination'/'Asian Alone', 2002-2020 only); every transcribed value re-verified against the fetched f08ar.xlsx (All Families 2024 row 10: $105,800 median/$144,500 mean; 1950 row 86: $3,319 current/$35,290 in 2024$; Four People 2024 row 259: $139,900). Race variants: f08w (White), f08b (Black), f08h (Hispanic), f08wnh (White not Hispanic), f08a (Asian).
Assumption: The composite family
Assumption: Getting to a family of four
Assumption: Values are shown in period money
U.S. Census Bureau, 2025 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Basis: Annual figure
Curator note: From Census F-8. 4-person families: median $62,670 ($107,200 in 2024 dollars). Average family size: 3.14.
Source note: Excel file (f08ar = All Races). The 4-person-family section is the primary source for the museum's family-of-four medians. Coverage window starts at 1947 — verify the 4-person column covers the full window. CORRECTION 2026-07-13: this source was registered with the f08a.xlsx URL, which is the ASIAN-families table (sections 'Asian Alone or in Combination'/'Asian Alone', 2002-2020 only); every transcribed value re-verified against the fetched f08ar.xlsx (All Families 2024 row 10: $105,800 median/$144,500 mean; 1950 row 86: $3,319 current/$35,290 in 2024$; Four People 2024 row 259: $139,900). Race variants: f08w (White), f08b (Black), f08h (Hispanic), f08wnh (White not Hispanic), f08a (Asian).
Assumption: The composite family
Assumption: Getting to a family of four
Assumption: Values are shown in period money
73,780,000A
Number of families in the United States, 2000observed record
families
Population measuredAll US families by family size (2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7+ persons), CPS money income
Source recordU.S. Census Bureau · 2025 · Tier A
Full record
Census Historical Income Table F-8: Families by Size and Median and Mean Income (All Races)
U.S. Census Bureau, 2025 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Curator note: From Census F-8.
Source note: Excel file (f08ar = All Races). The 4-person-family section is the primary source for the museum's family-of-four medians. Coverage window starts at 1947 — verify the 4-person column covers the full window. CORRECTION 2026-07-13: this source was registered with the f08a.xlsx URL, which is the ASIAN-families table (sections 'Asian Alone or in Combination'/'Asian Alone', 2002-2020 only); every transcribed value re-verified against the fetched f08ar.xlsx (All Families 2024 row 10: $105,800 median/$144,500 mean; 1950 row 86: $3,319 current/$35,290 in 2024$; Four People 2024 row 259: $139,900). Race variants: f08w (White), f08b (Black), f08h (Hispanic), f08wnh (White not Hispanic), f08a (Asian).
U.S. Census Bureau, 2025 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Curator note: From Census F-8.
Source note: Excel file (f08ar = All Races). The 4-person-family section is the primary source for the museum's family-of-four medians. Coverage window starts at 1947 — verify the 4-person column covers the full window. CORRECTION 2026-07-13: this source was registered with the f08a.xlsx URL, which is the ASIAN-families table (sections 'Asian Alone or in Combination'/'Asian Alone', 2002-2020 only); every transcribed value re-verified against the fetched f08ar.xlsx (All Families 2024 row 10: $105,800 median/$144,500 mean; 1950 row 86: $3,319 current/$35,290 in 2024$; Four People 2024 row 259: $139,900). Race variants: f08w (White), f08b (Black), f08h (Hispanic), f08wnh (White not Hispanic), f08a (Asian).
3.14A
Average family size, 2000observed record
persons per family
Population measuredAll US families by family size (2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7+ persons), CPS money income
Source recordU.S. Census Bureau · 2025 · Tier A
Full record
Census Historical Income Table F-8: Families by Size and Median and Mean Income (All Races)
U.S. Census Bureau, 2025 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Curator note: From Census F-8. Down from 3.18 in 1990. By 2010: 3.14 (flat).
Source note: Excel file (f08ar = All Races). The 4-person-family section is the primary source for the museum's family-of-four medians. Coverage window starts at 1947 — verify the 4-person column covers the full window. CORRECTION 2026-07-13: this source was registered with the f08a.xlsx URL, which is the ASIAN-families table (sections 'Asian Alone or in Combination'/'Asian Alone', 2002-2020 only); every transcribed value re-verified against the fetched f08ar.xlsx (All Families 2024 row 10: $105,800 median/$144,500 mean; 1950 row 86: $3,319 current/$35,290 in 2024$; Four People 2024 row 259: $139,900). Race variants: f08w (White), f08b (Black), f08h (Hispanic), f08wnh (White not Hispanic), f08a (Asian).
U.S. Census Bureau, 2025 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Curator note: From Census F-8. Down from 3.18 in 1990. By 2010: 3.14 (flat).
Source note: Excel file (f08ar = All Races). The 4-person-family section is the primary source for the museum's family-of-four medians. Coverage window starts at 1947 — verify the 4-person column covers the full window. CORRECTION 2026-07-13: this source was registered with the f08a.xlsx URL, which is the ASIAN-families table (sections 'Asian Alone or in Combination'/'Asian Alone', 2002-2020 only); every transcribed value re-verified against the fetched f08ar.xlsx (All Families 2024 row 10: $105,800 median/$144,500 mean; 1950 row 86: $3,319 current/$35,290 in 2024$; Four People 2024 row 259: $139,900). Race variants: f08w (White), f08b (Black), f08h (Hispanic), f08wnh (White not Hispanic), f08a (Asian).
11.3% (31.5 million people in poverty)A
Official poverty rate, 2000observed record
% of all people below official poverty level
Population measuredAll U.S. population (official poverty measure, CPS ASEC)
Source recordU.S. Census Bureau · 2024 · Tier A
Full record
Historical Poverty Tables (Census API: histpov2)
U.S. Census Bureau, 2024 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Curator note: From Census Historical Poverty Tables (API: histpov2). Official poverty rate: 11.3%. Family poverty: 9.6%. Near the pre-recession low. The 2008-09 Great Recession would push poverty to 15.1% by 2010.
Source note: Official poverty rate from the Current Population Survey Annual Social and Economic Supplement (CPS ASEC), accessed via Census API endpoint histpov2. Covers 1959-present. PCTPOV = percentage of all people below poverty level. PCTFAMPOV = percentage of people in families below poverty level. The official poverty measure uses pre-tax money income vs. poverty thresholds by family size and age. Data starts 1959 (first year of official poverty measure).
U.S. Census Bureau, 2024 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Curator note: From Census Historical Poverty Tables (API: histpov2). Official poverty rate: 11.3%. Family poverty: 9.6%. Near the pre-recession low. The 2008-09 Great Recession would push poverty to 15.1% by 2010.
Source note: Official poverty rate from the Current Population Survey Annual Social and Economic Supplement (CPS ASEC), accessed via Census API endpoint histpov2. Covers 1959-present. PCTPOV = percentage of all people below poverty level. PCTFAMPOV = percentage of people in families below poverty level. The official poverty measure uses pre-tax money income vs. poverty thresholds by family size and age. Data starts 1959 (first year of official poverty measure).
$38,045A
Average annual household expenditures, 2000observed record
USD per consumer unit, nominal
Population measuredConsumer units (households) in the civilian noninstitutionalized population
Source recordU.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics · 2024 · Tier A
Full record
Consumer Expenditure Survey (CEX)
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2024 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Curator note: From BLS CEX multi-year table (cu-all-multi-year-2000-2005.xlsx). All consumer units. Income before taxes: $44,649. Expenditure/income ratio: 85.2%. 109,367 thousand consumer units; 66% homeowners.
Source note: Continuous since 1980 (Interview + Diary surveys). Earlier surveys: 1960-61, 1972-73. Historical predecessors date to Commissioner of Labor surveys. FRASER has 1980-81 and 1982-83 reports. BLS 403-blocks automated requests — URL valid, access via browser.
Assumption: The composite family
Assumption: Values are shown in period money
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2024 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Curator note: From BLS CEX multi-year table (cu-all-multi-year-2000-2005.xlsx). All consumer units. Income before taxes: $44,649. Expenditure/income ratio: 85.2%. 109,367 thousand consumer units; 66% homeowners.
Source note: Continuous since 1980 (Interview + Diary surveys). Earlier surveys: 1960-61, 1972-73. Historical predecessors date to Commissioner of Labor surveys. FRASER has 1980-81 and 1982-83 reports. BLS 403-blocks automated requests — URL valid, access via browser.
Assumption: The composite family
Assumption: Values are shown in period money
85.2% — expenditures $38,045 vs income $44,649A
Expenditure-to-income ratio, 2000observed record
% (total expenditures ÷ income before taxes)
Population measuredConsumer units (households) in the civilian noninstitutionalized population
Source recordU.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics · 2024 · Tier A
Full record
Consumer Expenditure Survey (CEX)
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2024 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Curator note: Ratio of average annual expenditures to average income before taxes for all consumer units in 2000. It is not the average household expenditure-to-income ratio and does not identify how any particular family financed spending. The audit reproduces the percentage from both source means.
Source note: Continuous since 1980 (Interview + Diary surveys). Earlier surveys: 1960-61, 1972-73. Historical predecessors date to Commissioner of Labor surveys. FRASER has 1980-81 and 1982-83 reports. BLS 403-blocks automated requests — URL valid, access via browser.
Assumption: The composite family
Assumption: Values are shown in period money
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2024 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Curator note: Ratio of average annual expenditures to average income before taxes for all consumer units in 2000. It is not the average household expenditure-to-income ratio and does not identify how any particular family financed spending. The audit reproduces the percentage from both source means.
Source note: Continuous since 1980 (Interview + Diary surveys). Earlier surveys: 1960-61, 1972-73. Historical predecessors date to Commissioner of Labor surveys. FRASER has 1980-81 and 1982-83 reports. BLS 403-blocks automated requests — URL valid, access via browser.
Assumption: The composite family
Assumption: Values are shown in period money
The table
16 observations · 0 gaps · 1 computed$1,365.2 billion (13.3% of GDP)A
Healthcare spending, 2000observed record
USD billions, nominal; NHE as % of GDP
Population measuredUS resident population and total national health spending (all payers)
Source recordCenters for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Office of the Actuary · 2024 · Tier A
Full record
National Health Expenditure Accounts (NHEA)
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Office of the Actuary, 2024 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Curator note: From CMS NHE Table 01. NHE: $1,365.2B. GDP: $10,251.0B. Per capita: $4,842. Healthcare spending nearly doubled in the 1990s but GDP share growth slowed (managed care restraint).
Source note: CMS NHE tables cover calendar years 1960-2024. Table 01: aggregate amounts, per capita, percent of GDP. Table 02: by type of service and source of funds. Dollar amounts in current (nominal) dollars. Updated annually. Source files: NHE24_Summary.csv, NHE2024.csv. URL CORRECTION 2026-07-28: CMS changed the page slug from statistics-trends-reports to statistics-trends-and-reports (old URL 404s); content re-verified as the NHE data page.
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Office of the Actuary, 2024 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Curator note: From CMS NHE Table 01. NHE: $1,365.2B. GDP: $10,251.0B. Per capita: $4,842. Healthcare spending nearly doubled in the 1990s but GDP share growth slowed (managed care restraint).
Source note: CMS NHE tables cover calendar years 1960-2024. Table 01: aggregate amounts, per capita, percent of GDP. Table 02: by type of service and source of funds. Dollar amounts in current (nominal) dollars. Updated annually. Source files: NHE24_Summary.csv, NHE2024.csv. URL CORRECTION 2026-07-28: CMS changed the page slug from statistics-trends-reports to statistics-trends-and-reports (old URL 404s); content re-verified as the NHE data page.
$4,842 per capita ($4,101 for personal health care)A
National health spending per person, 2000observed record
USD per person, nominal
Population measuredUS resident population and total national health spending (all payers)
Source recordCenters for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Office of the Actuary · 2024 · Tier A
Full record
National Health Expenditure Accounts (NHEA)
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Office of the Actuary, 2024 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Curator note: From CMS NHE Table 01 (NHE24_Summary.csv). NHE per capita: $4,842. Personal Health Care per capita: $4,101. Population: 282M.
Source note: CMS NHE tables cover calendar years 1960-2024. Table 01: aggregate amounts, per capita, percent of GDP. Table 02: by type of service and source of funds. Dollar amounts in current (nominal) dollars. Updated annually. Source files: NHE24_Summary.csv, NHE2024.csv. URL CORRECTION 2026-07-28: CMS changed the page slug from statistics-trends-reports to statistics-trends-and-reports (old URL 404s); content re-verified as the NHE data page.
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Office of the Actuary, 2024 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Curator note: From CMS NHE Table 01 (NHE24_Summary.csv). NHE per capita: $4,842. Personal Health Care per capita: $4,101. Population: 282M.
Source note: CMS NHE tables cover calendar years 1960-2024. Table 01: aggregate amounts, per capita, percent of GDP. Table 02: by type of service and source of funds. Dollar amounts in current (nominal) dollars. Updated annually. Source files: NHE24_Summary.csv, NHE2024.csv. URL CORRECTION 2026-07-28: CMS changed the page slug from statistics-trends-reports to statistics-trends-and-reports (old URL 404s); content re-verified as the NHE data page.
$224,829 million (16.5% of NHE)A
Medicare spending, 2000observed record
USD millions, nominal
Population measuredUS resident population and total national health spending (all payers)
Source recordCenters for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Office of the Actuary · 2024 · Tier A
Full record
National Health Expenditure Accounts (NHEA)
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Office of the Actuary, 2024 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Curator note: From CMS NHE Table 02 (NHE2024.csv). Medicare: $224,829M of $1,365,184M total.
Source note: CMS NHE tables cover calendar years 1960-2024. Table 01: aggregate amounts, per capita, percent of GDP. Table 02: by type of service and source of funds. Dollar amounts in current (nominal) dollars. Updated annually. Source files: NHE24_Summary.csv, NHE2024.csv. URL CORRECTION 2026-07-28: CMS changed the page slug from statistics-trends-reports to statistics-trends-and-reports (old URL 404s); content re-verified as the NHE data page.
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Office of the Actuary, 2024 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Curator note: From CMS NHE Table 02 (NHE2024.csv). Medicare: $224,829M of $1,365,184M total.
Source note: CMS NHE tables cover calendar years 1960-2024. Table 01: aggregate amounts, per capita, percent of GDP. Table 02: by type of service and source of funds. Dollar amounts in current (nominal) dollars. Updated annually. Source files: NHE24_Summary.csv, NHE2024.csv. URL CORRECTION 2026-07-28: CMS changed the page slug from statistics-trends-reports to statistics-trends-and-reports (old URL 404s); content re-verified as the NHE data page.
$200,367 million (14.7% of NHE)A
Medicaid spending, 2000observed record
USD millions, nominal
Population measuredUS resident population and total national health spending (all payers)
Source recordCenters for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Office of the Actuary · 2024 · Tier A
Full record
National Health Expenditure Accounts (NHEA)
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Office of the Actuary, 2024 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Curator note: From CMS NHE Table 02 (NHE2024.csv). Medicaid: $200,367M of $1,365,184M total.
Source note: CMS NHE tables cover calendar years 1960-2024. Table 01: aggregate amounts, per capita, percent of GDP. Table 02: by type of service and source of funds. Dollar amounts in current (nominal) dollars. Updated annually. Source files: NHE24_Summary.csv, NHE2024.csv. URL CORRECTION 2026-07-28: CMS changed the page slug from statistics-trends-reports to statistics-trends-and-reports (old URL 404s); content re-verified as the NHE data page.
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Office of the Actuary, 2024 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Curator note: From CMS NHE Table 02 (NHE2024.csv). Medicaid: $200,367M of $1,365,184M total.
Source note: CMS NHE tables cover calendar years 1960-2024. Table 01: aggregate amounts, per capita, percent of GDP. Table 02: by type of service and source of funds. Dollar amounts in current (nominal) dollars. Updated annually. Source files: NHE24_Summary.csv, NHE2024.csv. URL CORRECTION 2026-07-28: CMS changed the page slug from statistics-trends-reports to statistics-trends-and-reports (old URL 404s); content re-verified as the NHE data page.
$122,003 million (8.9% of NHE)A
Prescription drug spending, 2000observed record
USD millions, nominal
Population measuredUS resident population and total national health spending (all payers)
Source recordCenters for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Office of the Actuary · 2024 · Tier A
Full record
National Health Expenditure Accounts (NHEA)
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Office of the Actuary, 2024 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Curator note: From CMS NHE Table 02 (NHE2024.csv). Prescription drugs: $122,003M of $1,365,184M total.
Source note: CMS NHE tables cover calendar years 1960-2024. Table 01: aggregate amounts, per capita, percent of GDP. Table 02: by type of service and source of funds. Dollar amounts in current (nominal) dollars. Updated annually. Source files: NHE24_Summary.csv, NHE2024.csv. URL CORRECTION 2026-07-28: CMS changed the page slug from statistics-trends-reports to statistics-trends-and-reports (old URL 404s); content re-verified as the NHE data page.
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Office of the Actuary, 2024 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Curator note: From CMS NHE Table 02 (NHE2024.csv). Prescription drugs: $122,003M of $1,365,184M total.
Source note: CMS NHE tables cover calendar years 1960-2024. Table 01: aggregate amounts, per capita, percent of GDP. Table 02: by type of service and source of funds. Dollar amounts in current (nominal) dollars. Updated annually. Source files: NHE24_Summary.csv, NHE2024.csv. URL CORRECTION 2026-07-28: CMS changed the page slug from statistics-trends-reports to statistics-trends-and-reports (old URL 404s); content re-verified as the NHE data page.
257.6 per 100,000A
Heart disease age-adjusted death rate, 2000observed record
age-adjusted deaths per 100,000 population
Population measuredU.S. resident population (death certificates, all causes)
Source recordNational Center for Health Statistics (CDC) · 2020 · Tier A
Full record
Age-adjusted Death Rates for Selected Major Causes of Death, 1900-2018
National Center for Health Statistics (CDC), 2020 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Curator note: From CDC NCHS. Down 56% from the 1950 peak. Statins became one of the most prescribed drug classes in America. Drug-eluting stents introduced 2003.
Source note: Covers 1900-2018 for 5 causes: Heart Disease, Cancer, Stroke, Accidents, Influenza/Pneumonia. Rates for 1900-1998 from NCHS Historical Data; 1999-2018 calculated using 2000 U.S. standard population. Citation: Bastian B, Tejada Vera B, Arias E, et al. Mortality trends in the United States, 1900-2018. NCHS. 2020.
Assumption: The composite family
National Center for Health Statistics (CDC), 2020 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Curator note: From CDC NCHS. Down 56% from the 1950 peak. Statins became one of the most prescribed drug classes in America. Drug-eluting stents introduced 2003.
Source note: Covers 1900-2018 for 5 causes: Heart Disease, Cancer, Stroke, Accidents, Influenza/Pneumonia. Rates for 1900-1998 from NCHS Historical Data; 1999-2018 calculated using 2000 U.S. standard population. Citation: Bastian B, Tejada Vera B, Arias E, et al. Mortality trends in the United States, 1900-2018. NCHS. 2020.
Assumption: The composite family
66.0%A
Cancer 5-year relative survival rate, 2000observed record
% surviving 5 years after diagnosis (relative survival, SEER 9)
Population measuredPatients diagnosed with cancer in SEER 9 registry areas (San Francisco, Connecticut, Detroit, Hawaii, Iowa, New Mexico, Seattle, Utah, Atlanta), all races, both sexes
Source recordNational Cancer Institute (NIH), Surveillance Research Program · 2020 · Tier A
Full record
SEER Cancer Statistics Review 1975-2017, Table 2.9: All Cancer Sites — Relative Survival by Year of Diagnosis
National Cancer Institute (NIH), Surveillance Research Program, 2020 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Curator note: From NCI SEER Cancer Statistics Review 1975-2017, Table 2.9. Targeted therapies entering the clinic: trastuzumab (Herceptin, 1998) for HER2+ breast cancer, imatinib (Gleevec, 2001) for CML.
Source note: 5-year relative survival rates by year of diagnosis, 1975-2016. SEER 9 registries cover ~10% of US population. Ederer II method.
Assumption: The composite family
National Cancer Institute (NIH), Surveillance Research Program, 2020 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Curator note: From NCI SEER Cancer Statistics Review 1975-2017, Table 2.9. Targeted therapies entering the clinic: trastuzumab (Herceptin, 1998) for HER2+ breast cancer, imatinib (Gleevec, 2001) for CML.
Source note: 5-year relative survival rates by year of diagnosis, 1975-2016. SEER 9 registries cover ~10% of US population. Ederer II method.
Assumption: The composite family
Food $8,622/yr (13.9% of expenditure). Food at home $4,846 (56% of food), food away from home $3,776 (44%). Key items: meats/poultry/fish/eggs $1,140, fruits/vegetables $780, cereals/bakery $666, dairy $556, beef $344. Total expenditure: $62,215.A
Food basket and expenditure breakdown, 2005 (CEX)observed record
USD per family per year, nominal
Population measuredConsumer units (households) in the civilian noninstitutionalized population
Source recordU.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics · 2024 · Tier A
Full record
Consumer Expenditure Survey (CEX)
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2024 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Curator note: From the 2005 CEX, Table 4. 15,807 thousand 4-person CUs. Food at home share: 56%, food away: 44%. Food away from home approaching half of food spending. Source: BLS CEX Table 4, 2005 (via Wayback Machine).
Source note: Continuous since 1980 (Interview + Diary surveys). Earlier surveys: 1960-61, 1972-73. Historical predecessors date to Commissioner of Labor surveys. FRASER has 1980-81 and 1982-83 reports. BLS 403-blocks automated requests — URL valid, access via browser.
Assumption: The composite family
Assumption: Income vs consumption
Assumption: Values are shown in period money
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2024 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Curator note: From the 2005 CEX, Table 4. 15,807 thousand 4-person CUs. Food at home share: 56%, food away: 44%. Food away from home approaching half of food spending. Source: BLS CEX Table 4, 2005 (via Wayback Machine).
Source note: Continuous since 1980 (Interview + Diary surveys). Earlier surveys: 1960-61, 1972-73. Historical predecessors date to Commissioner of Labor surveys. FRASER has 1980-81 and 1982-83 reports. BLS 403-blocks automated requests — URL valid, access via browser.
Assumption: The composite family
Assumption: Income vs consumption
Assumption: Values are shown in period money
Bread $0.99/lb, ground beef $1.98/lb, bacon $3.03/lb, eggs $0.96/doz, lettuce $0.85/lbA
Retail food prices, December 2000observed record
USD, retail prices (December 2000, BLS API)
Population measuredDepends on series (CPI: all urban consumers; food prices: urban consumers)
Source recordU.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics · 2024 · Tier A
Full record
BLS Public Data API v2
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2024 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Curator note: From BLS API: APU0000702111 (bread, white, pan, per lb), APU0000703111 (ground chuck, per lb), APU0000704111 (bacon, per lb), APU0000708111 (eggs, per doz), APU0000712211 (lettuce, per lb). Values are December 2000 monthly averages. CORRECTION 2026-07-08: previous version had mismatched labels. Bread up 41% from 1990 ($0.70→$0.99), bacon up 33% ($2.28→$3.03). Ground beef actually decreased slightly ($2.02→$1.98), reflecting changes in beef production. The 2000s saw rising global food demand and the beginning of biofuel-driven corn price increases.
Source note: Direct API access to BLS time series. Used for: average food prices (APU series), CPI-U (CUUR0000SA0), wage and hours data. API key registered. Food price series (APU) available from ~1970s onward — no 1950 data. Rate limit: 100 queries/day for registered users.
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2024 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Curator note: From BLS API: APU0000702111 (bread, white, pan, per lb), APU0000703111 (ground chuck, per lb), APU0000704111 (bacon, per lb), APU0000708111 (eggs, per doz), APU0000712211 (lettuce, per lb). Values are December 2000 monthly averages. CORRECTION 2026-07-08: previous version had mismatched labels. Bread up 41% from 1990 ($0.70→$0.99), bacon up 33% ($2.28→$3.03). Ground beef actually decreased slightly ($2.02→$1.98), reflecting changes in beef production. The 2000s saw rising global food demand and the beginning of biofuel-driven corn price increases.
Source note: Direct API access to BLS time series. Used for: average food prices (APU series), CPI-U (CUUR0000SA0), wage and hours data. API key registered. Food price series (APU) available from ~1970s onward — no 1950 data. Rate limit: 100 queries/day for registered users.
2,076 cigarettes per adult per yearA
Adult per capita cigarette consumption, 2000observed record
cigarettes per adult (≥18 years) per year
Population measuredU.S. adults ≥18 years (per capita consumption based on taxable removals)
Source recordCenters for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) · 2024 · Tier A
Full record
Adult Tobacco Consumption in the U.S., 2000-Present
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 2024 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Curator note: From CDC Adult Tobacco Consumption dataset (data.cdc.gov). Based on TTB taxable removals and Census adult population estimates. Down from 2,817 in 1990.
Source note: Dataset on data.cdc.gov. Annual per capita cigarette consumption 2000-2023 based on Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB) taxable removals data and Census adult population estimates. Downloads as CSV via Socrata API.
Assumption: The composite family
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 2024 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Curator note: From CDC Adult Tobacco Consumption dataset (data.cdc.gov). Based on TTB taxable removals and Census adult population estimates. Down from 2,817 in 1990.
Source note: Dataset on data.cdc.gov. Annual per capita cigarette consumption 2000-2023 based on Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB) taxable removals data and Census adult population estimates. Downloads as CSV via Socrata API.
Assumption: The composite family
2.19 gallons of pure ethanol per person per yearA
Alcohol consumed per person, 2000observed record
gallons of pure ethanol per person per year
Population measuredThe whole U.S. population aged 15 and older before 1970, and aged 14 and older from 1970 onward — not drinkers only, and not adults only
Source recordNational Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, Division of Epidemiology and Prevention Research (Alcohol Epidemiologic Data System) · 2025 · Tier A
Full record
Apparent Per Capita Alcohol Consumption: National, State, and Regional Trends, 1977-2023 (Surveillance Report #122)
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, Division of Epidemiology and Prevention Research (Alcohol Epidemiologic Data System), 2025 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Curator note: The long decline stopped around the turn of the century and reversed slowly, driven by wine and then spirits rather than beer, which continued to fall.
Source note: Table 1, 'Apparent per capita ethanol consumption, United States, 1850-2023', all-beverages column. Apparent consumption is derived from legal beverage sales and shipment data collected from States, the National Alcohol Beverage Control Association and industry sources, divided by Census population: it measures what the state could count, not what was drunk, which is why national Prohibition appears in the table as the literal word '(Prohibition)' and no numbers for 1920-1933. The report's own note records that data prior to 1977 are from Hyman et al. 1980, so the early half of this official series is republished scholarly work. Pre-1934 figures are published as multi-year ranges, not single years. The archived copy in samples/ was confirmed sha256-identical to the document served at this URL on 2026-09-01 (see docs/verification-log.md).
Assumption: The composite family
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, Division of Epidemiology and Prevention Research (Alcohol Epidemiologic Data System), 2025 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Curator note: The long decline stopped around the turn of the century and reversed slowly, driven by wine and then spirits rather than beer, which continued to fall.
Source note: Table 1, 'Apparent per capita ethanol consumption, United States, 1850-2023', all-beverages column. Apparent consumption is derived from legal beverage sales and shipment data collected from States, the National Alcohol Beverage Control Association and industry sources, divided by Census population: it measures what the state could count, not what was drunk, which is why national Prohibition appears in the table as the literal word '(Prohibition)' and no numbers for 1920-1933. The report's own note records that data prior to 1977 are from Hyman et al. 1980, so the early half of this official series is republished scholarly work. Pre-1934 figures are published as multi-year ranges, not single years. The archived copy in samples/ was confirmed sha256-identical to the document served at this URL on 2026-09-01 (see docs/verification-log.md).
Assumption: The composite family
7.52 pounds per person per yearA
Grapes available per person, 2000observed record
pounds per person per year (farm weight)
Population measuredThe whole US resident population — a supply-side average per person, not a measure of what anyone ate or of who ate it
Source recordU.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service · 2024 · Tier A
Full record
Food Availability (Per Capita) Data System — fresh fruit and fresh vegetable availability
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, 2024 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Curator note: Fresh grapes. Food availability, not intake: production plus imports less exports and non-food use, over population. Farm weight, as ERS publishes it. 2.6 times the 1970 figure.
Source note: Per-commodity sheets of the fresh-fruit and fresh-vegetable workbooks, farm-weight 'Per capita availability' column. Availability is a disappearance estimate: production plus imports, less exports, non-food use and (for fruit) shipments to US territories, divided by population. It measures what the food supply made available per person, not intake — ERS publishes a separate loss-adjusted series for consumption-like figures and this is not it. Each sheet also prints a retail-weight column derived by a stated conversion factor (0.92 broccoli and peppers, 0.94 avocados, 0.91 grapes); the unadjusted farm-weight column is taken and the factor is disclosed rather than applied. The two workbooks do not share a layout — the fruit sheets carry an extra 'Shipments to U.S. Territories' column and print the 'Farm' sub-header a row lower — so the extraction locates every column by its printed label and then verifies the result arithmetically: farm per-capita must equal food availability divided by population, for every year. Pointed one column right, at the retail figures, that check rejects all four commodities.
Assumption: The composite family
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, 2024 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Curator note: Fresh grapes. Food availability, not intake: production plus imports less exports and non-food use, over population. Farm weight, as ERS publishes it. 2.6 times the 1970 figure.
Source note: Per-commodity sheets of the fresh-fruit and fresh-vegetable workbooks, farm-weight 'Per capita availability' column. Availability is a disappearance estimate: production plus imports, less exports, non-food use and (for fruit) shipments to US territories, divided by population. It measures what the food supply made available per person, not intake — ERS publishes a separate loss-adjusted series for consumption-like figures and this is not it. Each sheet also prints a retail-weight column derived by a stated conversion factor (0.92 broccoli and peppers, 0.94 avocados, 0.91 grapes); the unadjusted farm-weight column is taken and the factor is disclosed rather than applied. The two workbooks do not share a layout — the fruit sheets carry an extra 'Shipments to U.S. Territories' column and print the 'Farm' sub-header a row lower — so the extraction locates every column by its printed label and then verifies the result arithmetically: farm per-capita must equal food availability divided by population, for every year. Pointed one column right, at the retail figures, that check rejects all four commodities.
Assumption: The composite family
2.26 pounds per person per yearA
Avocados available per person, 2000observed record
pounds per person per year (farm weight)
Population measuredThe whole US resident population — a supply-side average per person, not a measure of what anyone ate or of who ate it
Source recordU.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service · 2024 · Tier A
Full record
Food Availability (Per Capita) Data System — fresh fruit and fresh vegetable availability
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, 2024 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Curator note: Fresh avocados. Food availability, not intake: production plus imports less exports and non-food use, over population. Farm weight, as ERS publishes it. 5.0 times the 1970 figure.
Source note: Per-commodity sheets of the fresh-fruit and fresh-vegetable workbooks, farm-weight 'Per capita availability' column. Availability is a disappearance estimate: production plus imports, less exports, non-food use and (for fruit) shipments to US territories, divided by population. It measures what the food supply made available per person, not intake — ERS publishes a separate loss-adjusted series for consumption-like figures and this is not it. Each sheet also prints a retail-weight column derived by a stated conversion factor (0.92 broccoli and peppers, 0.94 avocados, 0.91 grapes); the unadjusted farm-weight column is taken and the factor is disclosed rather than applied. The two workbooks do not share a layout — the fruit sheets carry an extra 'Shipments to U.S. Territories' column and print the 'Farm' sub-header a row lower — so the extraction locates every column by its printed label and then verifies the result arithmetically: farm per-capita must equal food availability divided by population, for every year. Pointed one column right, at the retail figures, that check rejects all four commodities.
Assumption: The composite family
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, 2024 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Curator note: Fresh avocados. Food availability, not intake: production plus imports less exports and non-food use, over population. Farm weight, as ERS publishes it. 5.0 times the 1970 figure.
Source note: Per-commodity sheets of the fresh-fruit and fresh-vegetable workbooks, farm-weight 'Per capita availability' column. Availability is a disappearance estimate: production plus imports, less exports, non-food use and (for fruit) shipments to US territories, divided by population. It measures what the food supply made available per person, not intake — ERS publishes a separate loss-adjusted series for consumption-like figures and this is not it. Each sheet also prints a retail-weight column derived by a stated conversion factor (0.92 broccoli and peppers, 0.94 avocados, 0.91 grapes); the unadjusted farm-weight column is taken and the factor is disclosed rather than applied. The two workbooks do not share a layout — the fruit sheets carry an extra 'Shipments to U.S. Territories' column and print the 'Farm' sub-header a row lower — so the extraction locates every column by its printed label and then verifies the result arithmetically: farm per-capita must equal food availability divided by population, for every year. Pointed one column right, at the retail figures, that check rejects all four commodities.
Assumption: The composite family
8.19 pounds per person per yearA
Bell peppers available per person, 2000observed record
pounds per person per year (farm weight)
Population measuredThe whole US resident population — a supply-side average per person, not a measure of what anyone ate or of who ate it
Source recordU.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service · 2024 · Tier A
Full record
Food Availability (Per Capita) Data System — fresh fruit and fresh vegetable availability
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, 2024 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Curator note: Fresh bell peppers. Food availability, not intake: production plus imports less exports and non-food use, over population. Farm weight, as ERS publishes it. 3.9 times the 1960 figure.
Source note: Per-commodity sheets of the fresh-fruit and fresh-vegetable workbooks, farm-weight 'Per capita availability' column. Availability is a disappearance estimate: production plus imports, less exports, non-food use and (for fruit) shipments to US territories, divided by population. It measures what the food supply made available per person, not intake — ERS publishes a separate loss-adjusted series for consumption-like figures and this is not it. Each sheet also prints a retail-weight column derived by a stated conversion factor (0.92 broccoli and peppers, 0.94 avocados, 0.91 grapes); the unadjusted farm-weight column is taken and the factor is disclosed rather than applied. The two workbooks do not share a layout — the fruit sheets carry an extra 'Shipments to U.S. Territories' column and print the 'Farm' sub-header a row lower — so the extraction locates every column by its printed label and then verifies the result arithmetically: farm per-capita must equal food availability divided by population, for every year. Pointed one column right, at the retail figures, that check rejects all four commodities.
Assumption: The composite family
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, 2024 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Curator note: Fresh bell peppers. Food availability, not intake: production plus imports less exports and non-food use, over population. Farm weight, as ERS publishes it. 3.9 times the 1960 figure.
Source note: Per-commodity sheets of the fresh-fruit and fresh-vegetable workbooks, farm-weight 'Per capita availability' column. Availability is a disappearance estimate: production plus imports, less exports, non-food use and (for fruit) shipments to US territories, divided by population. It measures what the food supply made available per person, not intake — ERS publishes a separate loss-adjusted series for consumption-like figures and this is not it. Each sheet also prints a retail-weight column derived by a stated conversion factor (0.92 broccoli and peppers, 0.94 avocados, 0.91 grapes); the unadjusted farm-weight column is taken and the factor is disclosed rather than applied. The two workbooks do not share a layout — the fruit sheets carry an extra 'Shipments to U.S. Territories' column and print the 'Farm' sub-header a row lower — so the extraction locates every column by its printed label and then verifies the result arithmetically: farm per-capita must equal food availability divided by population, for every year. Pointed one column right, at the retail figures, that check rejects all four commodities.
Assumption: The composite family
5.89 pounds per person per yearA
Broccoli available per person, 2000observed record
pounds per person per year (farm weight)
Population measuredThe whole US resident population — a supply-side average per person, not a measure of what anyone ate or of who ate it
Source recordU.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service · 2024 · Tier A
Full record
Food Availability (Per Capita) Data System — fresh fruit and fresh vegetable availability
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, 2024 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Curator note: Fresh broccoli. Food availability, not intake: production plus imports less exports and non-food use, over population. Farm weight, as ERS publishes it. 14.7 times the 1960 figure.
Source note: Per-commodity sheets of the fresh-fruit and fresh-vegetable workbooks, farm-weight 'Per capita availability' column. Availability is a disappearance estimate: production plus imports, less exports, non-food use and (for fruit) shipments to US territories, divided by population. It measures what the food supply made available per person, not intake — ERS publishes a separate loss-adjusted series for consumption-like figures and this is not it. Each sheet also prints a retail-weight column derived by a stated conversion factor (0.92 broccoli and peppers, 0.94 avocados, 0.91 grapes); the unadjusted farm-weight column is taken and the factor is disclosed rather than applied. The two workbooks do not share a layout — the fruit sheets carry an extra 'Shipments to U.S. Territories' column and print the 'Farm' sub-header a row lower — so the extraction locates every column by its printed label and then verifies the result arithmetically: farm per-capita must equal food availability divided by population, for every year. Pointed one column right, at the retail figures, that check rejects all four commodities.
Assumption: The composite family
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, 2024 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Curator note: Fresh broccoli. Food availability, not intake: production plus imports less exports and non-food use, over population. Farm weight, as ERS publishes it. 14.7 times the 1960 figure.
Source note: Per-commodity sheets of the fresh-fruit and fresh-vegetable workbooks, farm-weight 'Per capita availability' column. Availability is a disappearance estimate: production plus imports, less exports, non-food use and (for fruit) shipments to US territories, divided by population. It measures what the food supply made available per person, not intake — ERS publishes a separate loss-adjusted series for consumption-like figures and this is not it. Each sheet also prints a retail-weight column derived by a stated conversion factor (0.92 broccoli and peppers, 0.94 avocados, 0.91 grapes); the unadjusted farm-weight column is taken and the factor is disclosed rather than applied. The two workbooks do not share a layout — the fruit sheets carry an extra 'Shipments to U.S. Territories' column and print the 'Farm' sub-header a row lower — so the extraction locates every column by its printed label and then verifies the result arithmetically: farm per-capita must equal food availability divided by population, for every year. Pointed one column right, at the retail figures, that check rejects all four commodities.
Assumption: The composite family
23.3% of adults smoked (25.7% of men, 21.0% of women)A
Adult cigarette smoking prevalence, 2000observed record
% of adults ≥18 who currently smoke (NHIS)
Population measuredU.S. civilian noninstitutionalized adults ≥18 years (NHIS household interview survey)
Source recordNational Center for Health Statistics (CDC) · 2024 · Tier A
Full record
National Health Interview Survey: Adult Cigarette Smoking Prevalence, 1965-2022
National Center for Health Statistics (CDC), 2024 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Curator note: From CDC NHIS (compiled by American Lung Association). Note: NHIS survey was redesigned in 1997, so pre-1997 and post-1997 data may not be directly comparable. Smoking continued its steady decline.
Source note: NHIS data 1965-2022. Pre-1997 from published NCHS Series 10 reports; 1997-2022 from ALA analysis of NHIS public-use files using SPSS. Current smoker defined as smoked ≥100 cigarettes and currently smoking every day or some days. 2025 preliminary: 9.1% (CDC FastStats). Survey redesign in 1997 means pre/post may not be directly comparable.
Assumption: The composite family
National Center for Health Statistics (CDC), 2024 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Curator note: From CDC NHIS (compiled by American Lung Association). Note: NHIS survey was redesigned in 1997, so pre-1997 and post-1997 data may not be directly comparable. Smoking continued its steady decline.
Source note: NHIS data 1965-2022. Pre-1997 from published NCHS Series 10 reports; 1997-2022 from ALA analysis of NHIS public-use files using SPSS. Current smoker defined as smoked ≥100 cigarettes and currently smoking every day or some days. 2025 preliminary: 9.1% (CDC FastStats). Survey redesign in 1997 means pre/post may not be directly comparable.
Assumption: The composite family
38 of 54A
Fresh-produce commodities at a pound or more per person, 2000computed exhibit
of the fresh-produce commodities ERS tracked that year
MethodComputed by vitrine · count_above
ConfidenceTier A · weakest input governs
Open derivation
Computed by vitrine (count_above) — never authored by hand:
Rule: inputs whose 2000 value is at or above 1.0 pounds per person per year (farm weight)
Result: 38 of 54 — the total is the inputs with a published value that year
Inputs: 54 series: us-availability-apples, us-availability-apricots, us-availability-artichokes, us-availability-asparagus, us-availability-avocados, us-availability-bananas, us-availability-bell-peppers, us-availability-blueberries, us-availability-broccoli, us-availability-brussels-sprouts, us-availability-cabbage, us-availability-cantaloupe, us-availability-carrots, us-availability-cauliflower, us-availability-celery, us-availability-collards, us-availability-cucumbers, us-availability-eggplant, us-availability-escarole, us-availability-garlic, us-availability-grapefruit, us-availability-grapes, us-availability-head-lettuce, us-availability-honeydew, us-availability-kale, us-availability-kiwifruit, us-availability-lemons, us-availability-lima-beans, us-availability-limes, us-availability-mangoes, us-availability-mushrooms, us-availability-mustard-greens, us-availability-okra, us-availability-onions, us-availability-oranges, us-availability-papayas, us-availability-peaches, us-availability-pears, us-availability-pineapples, us-availability-potatoes, us-availability-pumpkin, us-availability-radishes, us-availability-raspberries, us-availability-romaine, us-availability-snap-beans, us-availability-spinach, us-availability-squash, us-availability-strawberries, us-availability-sweet-corn, us-availability-sweet-potatoes, us-availability-tangerines, us-availability-tomatoes, us-availability-turnip-greens, us-availability-watermelon
Confidence: A — Official series, the weakest input tier
Curator note: Every fresh fruit and vegetable commodity sheet in the two ERS fresh workbooks, counted when the food supply provided at least a full pound per person that year, farm weight. The total is the commodities ERS tracked that year: series that had not yet begun or had already ended are outside the count, so a widening record cannot masquerade as rising variety. Availability is a disappearance estimate — what the supply made available, not what anyone ate; the rule and its rationale are in the assumption ledger (produce-variety-rule).
Assumption: The produce-variety count and its one-pound rule
Assumption: The composite family
Rule: inputs whose 2000 value is at or above 1.0 pounds per person per year (farm weight)
Result: 38 of 54 — the total is the inputs with a published value that year
Inputs: 54 series: us-availability-apples, us-availability-apricots, us-availability-artichokes, us-availability-asparagus, us-availability-avocados, us-availability-bananas, us-availability-bell-peppers, us-availability-blueberries, us-availability-broccoli, us-availability-brussels-sprouts, us-availability-cabbage, us-availability-cantaloupe, us-availability-carrots, us-availability-cauliflower, us-availability-celery, us-availability-collards, us-availability-cucumbers, us-availability-eggplant, us-availability-escarole, us-availability-garlic, us-availability-grapefruit, us-availability-grapes, us-availability-head-lettuce, us-availability-honeydew, us-availability-kale, us-availability-kiwifruit, us-availability-lemons, us-availability-lima-beans, us-availability-limes, us-availability-mangoes, us-availability-mushrooms, us-availability-mustard-greens, us-availability-okra, us-availability-onions, us-availability-oranges, us-availability-papayas, us-availability-peaches, us-availability-pears, us-availability-pineapples, us-availability-potatoes, us-availability-pumpkin, us-availability-radishes, us-availability-raspberries, us-availability-romaine, us-availability-snap-beans, us-availability-spinach, us-availability-squash, us-availability-strawberries, us-availability-sweet-corn, us-availability-sweet-potatoes, us-availability-tangerines, us-availability-tomatoes, us-availability-turnip-greens, us-availability-watermelon
Confidence: A — Official series, the weakest input tier
Curator note: Every fresh fruit and vegetable commodity sheet in the two ERS fresh workbooks, counted when the food supply provided at least a full pound per person that year, farm weight. The total is the commodities ERS tracked that year: series that had not yet begun or had already ended are outside the count, so a widening record cannot masquerade as rising variety. Availability is a disappearance estimate — what the supply made available, not what anyone ate; the rule and its rationale are in the assumption ledger (produce-variety-rule).
Assumption: The produce-variety count and its one-pound rule
Assumption: The composite family
The day
17 observations · 0 gaps74.3 male, 79.7 female (77.0 total, all races)A
Life expectancy at birth, 2000observed record
years
Population measuredU.S. resident population (death certificates)
Source recordNational Center for Health Statistics (CDC) · 2024 · Tier A
Full record
National Vital Statistics System: Life Tables and Infant Mortality
National Center for Health Statistics (CDC), 2024 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Curator note: From NCHS National Vital Statistics System. Up from 71.8/78.8 in 1990. Life expectancy would peak at 78.9 in 2014 before the opioid crisis and COVID-19.
Source note: NCHS publishes annual life tables via the National Vital Statistics Reports series. Life expectancy at birth (all races): 1960: 69.7 total / 66.6M / 73.1F; 1970: 70.8 / 67.1M / 74.8F; 1980: 73.7 / 70.0M / 77.5F; 1990: 75.4 / 71.8M / 78.8F; 2000: 77.0 / 74.3M / 79.7F; 2010: 78.7 / 76.2M / 81.0F; 2023: 78.4 / 75.8M / 81.1F (Data Brief No. 521). 2024 provisional: 79.0 / 76.5M / 81.4F. Infant mortality rates (all races, per 1,000 live births) from Health, United States, 2016, Table 11: 1950: 29.2; 1960: 26.0; 1970: 20.0; 1980: 12.6; 1990: 9.2; 2000: 6.9; 2010: 6.1; 2015: 5.9. URL for infant mortality table: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/hus/2016/011.pdf
National Center for Health Statistics (CDC), 2024 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Curator note: From NCHS National Vital Statistics System. Up from 71.8/78.8 in 1990. Life expectancy would peak at 78.9 in 2014 before the opioid crisis and COVID-19.
Source note: NCHS publishes annual life tables via the National Vital Statistics Reports series. Life expectancy at birth (all races): 1960: 69.7 total / 66.6M / 73.1F; 1970: 70.8 / 67.1M / 74.8F; 1980: 73.7 / 70.0M / 77.5F; 1990: 75.4 / 71.8M / 78.8F; 2000: 77.0 / 74.3M / 79.7F; 2010: 78.7 / 76.2M / 81.0F; 2023: 78.4 / 75.8M / 81.1F (Data Brief No. 521). 2024 provisional: 79.0 / 76.5M / 81.4F. Infant mortality rates (all races, per 1,000 live births) from Health, United States, 2016, Table 11: 1950: 29.2; 1960: 26.0; 1970: 20.0; 1980: 12.6; 1990: 9.2; 2000: 6.9; 2010: 6.1; 2015: 5.9. URL for infant mortality table: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/hus/2016/011.pdf
$14.01A
Average hourly earnings, total private production and nonsupervisory employees, 2000observed record
USD per hour, nominal
Population measuredProduction and nonsupervisory employees, total private sector
Source recordFederal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (source: BLS Current Employment Statistics) · 2024 · Tier A
Full record
Average Hourly Earnings of Production and Nonsupervisory Employees, Total Private (AHETPI)
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (source: BLS Current Employment Statistics), 2024 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Basis: Hourly rate
Curator note: Arithmetic mean of twelve monthly seasonally adjusted BLS CES0500000008 observations for 2000. Audited against the saved BLS API response retrieved 2026-09-07; rounded once to cents. This is an average worker wage, not median family income.
Source note: Average (not median) hourly earnings. Coverage: 1964-present, monthly. BLS source code: CES0500000008. Used as an explicitly average wage benchmark in the work-buys panel; it does not identify median worker purchasing power.
Assumption: Values are shown in period money
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (source: BLS Current Employment Statistics), 2024 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Basis: Hourly rate
Curator note: Arithmetic mean of twelve monthly seasonally adjusted BLS CES0500000008 observations for 2000. Audited against the saved BLS API response retrieved 2026-09-07; rounded once to cents. This is an average worker wage, not median family income.
Source note: Average (not median) hourly earnings. Coverage: 1964-present, monthly. BLS source code: CES0500000008. Used as an explicitly average wage benchmark in the work-buys panel; it does not identify median worker purchasing power.
Assumption: Values are shown in period money
Sleeping 8.57 hrs, working 3.69 hrs, leisure 5.11 hrs, watching TV 2.58 hrsA
How Americans spend their day, 2003 (ATUS)observed record
hours per day, civilian population ages 15+ (annual average)
Population measuredCivilian noninstitutionalized population age 15+
Source recordU.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics · 2024 · Tier A
Full record
American Time Use Survey (ATUS)
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2024 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Curator note: From BLS American Time Use Survey, Table A-1 (2003 annual averages). First year of ATUS. Sleeping rose to 9.04 hrs by 2024; TV watching peaked at 2.82 in 2009 then declined to 2.60 by 2024; working declined to 3.32 by 2025. Percent working fell from 46.2% (2003) to 37.3% (2024), reflecting aging population.
Source note: Started 2003, annual. Covers work hours, commute time, daily activities. Primary source for the 'day' panel from 2000s onward. BLS 403-blocks automated requests — URL valid, access via browser. Tables used: 2010 annual averages (a1_2010.pdf, a2_2010.pdf) for the 2010s room; 2024 annual averages (a1-2024.pdf) for the 2020s room. The survey year in fact labels identifies which annual average is cited.
Assumption: The composite family
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2024 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Curator note: From BLS American Time Use Survey, Table A-1 (2003 annual averages). First year of ATUS. Sleeping rose to 9.04 hrs by 2024; TV watching peaked at 2.82 in 2009 then declined to 2.60 by 2024; working declined to 3.32 by 2025. Percent working fell from 46.2% (2003) to 37.3% (2024), reflecting aging population.
Source note: Started 2003, annual. Covers work hours, commute time, daily activities. Primary source for the 'day' panel from 2000s onward. BLS 403-blocks automated requests — URL valid, access via browser. Tables used: 2010 annual averages (a1_2010.pdf, a2_2010.pdf) for the 2010s room; 2024 annual averages (a1-2024.pdf) for the 2020s room. The survey year in fact labels identifies which annual average is cited.
Assumption: The composite family
29.3C
Women's weekly unpaid home-production hours, 2005observed record
hours per week, prime-age women (ages 18–64)
Population measuredPrime-age women and men, ages 18–64 (benchmark years 1900–2005); also all-ages per-capita and per-household aggregates
Source recordCambridge University Press (Journal of Economic History) · 2009 · Tier C
Full record
Time Spent in Home Production in the Twentieth-Century United States: New Estimates from Old Data
Cambridge University Press (Journal of Economic History), 2009 · source
Confidence: C — Reconstructed from period surveys
Curator note: Ramey (2009) Table 6A, 'All Prime-Age Women' column. Reconstruction from historical time-diary studies (Purnell Act 1920s, Wilson 1929, USDA 1944) linked to AHTUS/BLS surveys from 1965. Includes food prep, house cleaning, clothing care, childcare, purchasing, and household management. Numbers in italics in source = partially extrapolated. Draft version (NBER w13985) has identical values. Splice caveat: Ramey measures women-specific home production ages 18-64; ATUS (2020s room) measures all-adult household activities age 15+ — a concept change that must caveat when plotted together.
Source note: Valerie A. Ramey, JEconHist 69(1), March 2009, pp. 1–47. Reconstruction from historical time-diary studies (Purnell Act studies 1920s, Wilson 1929, USDA 1944) linked to AHTUS/BLS modern surveys. Draft version: NBER Working Paper w13985 (May 2008, 63pp) — data tables are numerically identical to the published version; differences are prose tightening and table reformatting (5→5A/5B, etc.). Tier C (period-survey reconstruction). Key tables: Table 5A (nonemployed women), Table 6A (all women, prime-age), Table 7 (men, prime-age), Table 8A (all ages), Table 3 (component breakdown). Note: Ramey does not use the 1992-94 survey (missing data), so no 1990s benchmark. Splice point to ATUS: Ramey measures women-specific home production ages 18-64; ATUS measures all-adult household activities age 15+ — a concept splice that must caveat (Plan 004 Measure guard).
Assumption: The composite family
Cambridge University Press (Journal of Economic History), 2009 · source
Confidence: C — Reconstructed from period surveys
Curator note: Ramey (2009) Table 6A, 'All Prime-Age Women' column. Reconstruction from historical time-diary studies (Purnell Act 1920s, Wilson 1929, USDA 1944) linked to AHTUS/BLS surveys from 1965. Includes food prep, house cleaning, clothing care, childcare, purchasing, and household management. Numbers in italics in source = partially extrapolated. Draft version (NBER w13985) has identical values. Splice caveat: Ramey measures women-specific home production ages 18-64; ATUS (2020s room) measures all-adult household activities age 15+ — a concept change that must caveat when plotted together.
Source note: Valerie A. Ramey, JEconHist 69(1), March 2009, pp. 1–47. Reconstruction from historical time-diary studies (Purnell Act studies 1920s, Wilson 1929, USDA 1944) linked to AHTUS/BLS modern surveys. Draft version: NBER Working Paper w13985 (May 2008, 63pp) — data tables are numerically identical to the published version; differences are prose tightening and table reformatting (5→5A/5B, etc.). Tier C (period-survey reconstruction). Key tables: Table 5A (nonemployed women), Table 6A (all women, prime-age), Table 7 (men, prime-age), Table 8A (all ages), Table 3 (component breakdown). Note: Ramey does not use the 1992-94 survey (missing data), so no 1990s benchmark. Splice point to ATUS: Ramey measures women-specific home production ages 18-64; ATUS measures all-adult household activities age 15+ — a concept splice that must caveat (Plan 004 Measure guard).
Assumption: The composite family
16.8C
Men's weekly unpaid home-production hours, 2005observed record
hours per week, prime-age men (ages 18–64)
Population measuredPrime-age women and men, ages 18–64 (benchmark years 1900–2005); also all-ages per-capita and per-household aggregates
Source recordCambridge University Press (Journal of Economic History) · 2009 · Tier C
Full record
Time Spent in Home Production in the Twentieth-Century United States: New Estimates from Old Data
Cambridge University Press (Journal of Economic History), 2009 · source
Confidence: C — Reconstructed from period surveys
Curator note: Ramey (2009) Table 7, 'All Prime-Age Men' column. Early estimates from Purnell Act studies and Lundberg et al. (1934); 1965+ from AHTUS/BLS. Men's hours rose 13 hrs/week across the century (3.9→16.8), partially offsetting women's decline. Numbers in italics in source = partially extrapolated.
Source note: Valerie A. Ramey, JEconHist 69(1), March 2009, pp. 1–47. Reconstruction from historical time-diary studies (Purnell Act studies 1920s, Wilson 1929, USDA 1944) linked to AHTUS/BLS modern surveys. Draft version: NBER Working Paper w13985 (May 2008, 63pp) — data tables are numerically identical to the published version; differences are prose tightening and table reformatting (5→5A/5B, etc.). Tier C (period-survey reconstruction). Key tables: Table 5A (nonemployed women), Table 6A (all women, prime-age), Table 7 (men, prime-age), Table 8A (all ages), Table 3 (component breakdown). Note: Ramey does not use the 1992-94 survey (missing data), so no 1990s benchmark. Splice point to ATUS: Ramey measures women-specific home production ages 18-64; ATUS measures all-adult household activities age 15+ — a concept splice that must caveat (Plan 004 Measure guard).
Assumption: The composite family
Cambridge University Press (Journal of Economic History), 2009 · source
Confidence: C — Reconstructed from period surveys
Curator note: Ramey (2009) Table 7, 'All Prime-Age Men' column. Early estimates from Purnell Act studies and Lundberg et al. (1934); 1965+ from AHTUS/BLS. Men's hours rose 13 hrs/week across the century (3.9→16.8), partially offsetting women's decline. Numbers in italics in source = partially extrapolated.
Source note: Valerie A. Ramey, JEconHist 69(1), March 2009, pp. 1–47. Reconstruction from historical time-diary studies (Purnell Act studies 1920s, Wilson 1929, USDA 1944) linked to AHTUS/BLS modern surveys. Draft version: NBER Working Paper w13985 (May 2008, 63pp) — data tables are numerically identical to the published version; differences are prose tightening and table reformatting (5→5A/5B, etc.). Tier C (period-survey reconstruction). Key tables: Table 5A (nonemployed women), Table 6A (all women, prime-age), Table 7 (men, prime-age), Table 8A (all ages), Table 3 (component breakdown). Note: Ramey does not use the 1992-94 survey (missing data), so no 1990s benchmark. Splice point to ATUS: Ramey measures women-specific home production ages 18-64; ATUS measures all-adult household activities age 15+ — a concept splice that must caveat (Plan 004 Measure guard).
Assumption: The composite family
49C
Total home-production hours per household, 2005observed record
hours per week, all household members combined
Population measuredPrime-age women and men, ages 18–64 (benchmark years 1900–2005); also all-ages per-capita and per-household aggregates
Source recordCambridge University Press (Journal of Economic History) · 2009 · Tier C
Full record
Time Spent in Home Production in the Twentieth-Century United States: New Estimates from Old Data
Cambridge University Press (Journal of Economic History), 2009 · source
Confidence: C — Reconstructed from period surveys
Curator note: Ramey (2009), aggregate home-production hours divided by number of households. Fell from 78 hrs/week (1900) to 49 hrs/week (2005), a 37% decline. Household size fell 45% (4.7→2.6 persons) over the same period, so per-household hours fell proportionally less than household size. Per-capita (all ages) was 18.5 hrs/week — slightly higher in 2005 than 1900 because fewer children (who do little home production) are in the population.
Source note: Valerie A. Ramey, JEconHist 69(1), March 2009, pp. 1–47. Reconstruction from historical time-diary studies (Purnell Act studies 1920s, Wilson 1929, USDA 1944) linked to AHTUS/BLS modern surveys. Draft version: NBER Working Paper w13985 (May 2008, 63pp) — data tables are numerically identical to the published version; differences are prose tightening and table reformatting (5→5A/5B, etc.). Tier C (period-survey reconstruction). Key tables: Table 5A (nonemployed women), Table 6A (all women, prime-age), Table 7 (men, prime-age), Table 8A (all ages), Table 3 (component breakdown). Note: Ramey does not use the 1992-94 survey (missing data), so no 1990s benchmark. Splice point to ATUS: Ramey measures women-specific home production ages 18-64; ATUS measures all-adult household activities age 15+ — a concept splice that must caveat (Plan 004 Measure guard).
Assumption: The composite family
Cambridge University Press (Journal of Economic History), 2009 · source
Confidence: C — Reconstructed from period surveys
Curator note: Ramey (2009), aggregate home-production hours divided by number of households. Fell from 78 hrs/week (1900) to 49 hrs/week (2005), a 37% decline. Household size fell 45% (4.7→2.6 persons) over the same period, so per-household hours fell proportionally less than household size. Per-capita (all ages) was 18.5 hrs/week — slightly higher in 2005 than 1900 because fewer children (who do little home production) are in the population.
Source note: Valerie A. Ramey, JEconHist 69(1), March 2009, pp. 1–47. Reconstruction from historical time-diary studies (Purnell Act studies 1920s, Wilson 1929, USDA 1944) linked to AHTUS/BLS modern surveys. Draft version: NBER Working Paper w13985 (May 2008, 63pp) — data tables are numerically identical to the published version; differences are prose tightening and table reformatting (5→5A/5B, etc.). Tier C (period-survey reconstruction). Key tables: Table 5A (nonemployed women), Table 6A (all women, prime-age), Table 7 (men, prime-age), Table 8A (all ages), Table 3 (component breakdown). Note: Ramey does not use the 1992-94 survey (missing data), so no 1990s benchmark. Splice point to ATUS: Ramey measures women-specific home production ages 18-64; ATUS measures all-adult household activities age 15+ — a concept splice that must caveat (Plan 004 Measure guard).
Assumption: The composite family
1.53 deaths per 100 million vehicle-miles travelledA
Road deaths per 100 million vehicle-miles, 2000observed record
deaths per 100 million vehicle-miles travelled
Population measuredAll persons killed in motor-vehicle traffic crashes on US public roads (the States and the District of Columbia), measured against total vehicle-miles travelled — not drivers only and not vehicle occupants only
Source recordFederal Highway Administration, Office of Highway Policy Information · 2025 · Tier A
Full record
Table FI-200: Motor Vehicle Traffic Fatalities, 1900-2023 (Highway Statistics 2023)
Federal Highway Administration, Office of Highway Policy Information, 2025 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Curator note: Travel passed 2.7 trillion vehicle-miles a year while deaths stayed near 42,000: the rate falls because the denominator grows.
Source note: The whole 1900-2023 span in one FHWA table, so the fatality-rate series needs no splice between estimate and registration eras. Four rate columns are published side by side (per 1,000 miles of road, per 100 million annual VMT, per 100,000 registered motor vehicles, per 100,000 licensed drivers); the museum takes the per-100-million-VMT column, and the extraction script recomputes it from the table's own fatality and VMT columns for every year rather than trusting its position. FHWA footnote (3) records a definitional change: beginning in 1976 the count includes only people who died within 30 days of the crash, so the earlier years are counted on a wider window and the two halves are not the same measurement. The 1900-1995 rows were cross-checked against FHWA's separately-published Highway Statistics Summary to 1995 (April 1997): 95 of 96 years reproduce exactly, the exception being 1995, that publication's terminal provisional year, since revised from 41,770 deaths to 41,817 (see docs/verification-log.md).
Assumption: The composite family
Federal Highway Administration, Office of Highway Policy Information, 2025 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Curator note: Travel passed 2.7 trillion vehicle-miles a year while deaths stayed near 42,000: the rate falls because the denominator grows.
Source note: The whole 1900-2023 span in one FHWA table, so the fatality-rate series needs no splice between estimate and registration eras. Four rate columns are published side by side (per 1,000 miles of road, per 100 million annual VMT, per 100,000 registered motor vehicles, per 100,000 licensed drivers); the museum takes the per-100-million-VMT column, and the extraction script recomputes it from the table's own fatality and VMT columns for every year rather than trusting its position. FHWA footnote (3) records a definitional change: beginning in 1976 the count includes only people who died within 30 days of the crash, so the earlier years are counted on a wider window and the two halves are not the same measurement. The 1900-1995 rows were cross-checked against FHWA's separately-published Highway Statistics Summary to 1995 (April 1997): 95 of 96 years reproduce exactly, the exception being 1995, that publication's terminal provisional year, since revised from 41,770 deaths to 41,817 (see docs/verification-log.md).
Assumption: The composite family
47.7 live births per 1,000 women aged 15-19A
Births per 1,000 women aged 15-19, 2000observed record
live births per 1,000 women aged 15-19
Population measuredAll women aged 15-19 resident in the United States, all races and origins — the denominator is every woman in the age band, not those who were sexually active or married
Source recordNational Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · 2021 · Tier A
Full record
Health, United States, 2019 — Table 1: Crude birth rates, fertility rates, and birth rates, by age, race, and Hispanic origin of mother, selected years 1950-2018
National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2021 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Curator note: Below the 1980 low for the first time, and falling faster than in any earlier stretch of the published table.
Source note: The All-races block, 15-19 'Total' column. The table repeats its whole structure once per race and origin group and prints 15-17 and 18-19 sub-columns beside the total, so both the block and the column are located explicitly by the extraction script rather than by position. Selected years, not annual: NCHS publishes 1950, 1960, 1970, 1980, 1990, 1995, 2000, 2005, 2010 and then most recent years, and the gaps between printed rows are not interpolated. This 2019 edition is cited rather than the newer 2020-2021 one because the later edition drops 2010 from its selected years. Cross-checked against that later edition (12 overlapping years, all identical) and against NVSR 72-1 Table 2, compiled independently of the trend tables (6 overlapping years, all identical). Note that cdc.gov returns 403 to browser-like User-Agents and serves plain tool agents instead — the opposite of bls.gov; scripts/link_check.py retries 403s with a plain agent for this reason.
Assumption: The composite family
National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2021 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Curator note: Below the 1980 low for the first time, and falling faster than in any earlier stretch of the published table.
Source note: The All-races block, 15-19 'Total' column. The table repeats its whole structure once per race and origin group and prints 15-17 and 18-19 sub-columns beside the total, so both the block and the column are located explicitly by the extraction script rather than by position. Selected years, not annual: NCHS publishes 1950, 1960, 1970, 1980, 1990, 1995, 2000, 2005, 2010 and then most recent years, and the gaps between printed rows are not interpolated. This 2019 edition is cited rather than the newer 2020-2021 one because the later edition drops 2010 from its selected years. Cross-checked against that later edition (12 overlapping years, all identical) and against NVSR 72-1 Table 2, compiled independently of the trend tables (6 overlapping years, all identical). Note that cdc.gov returns 403 to browser-like User-Agents and serves plain tool agents instead — the opposite of bls.gov; scripts/link_check.py retries 403s with a plain agent for this reason.
Assumption: The composite family
4.2 fatal work injuries per 100,000 full-time-equivalent workersA
Deaths at work per 100,000 workers, 2006observed record
fatal work injuries per 100,000 full-time-equivalent workers
Population measuredAll US workers, employed and self-employed, measured against total hours worked as estimated by the Current Population Survey — not employed persons, which was the pre-2006 denominator
Source recordU.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities program · 2025 · Tier A
Full record
Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries: hours-based fatal work injury rates, 2006-2024
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities program, 2025 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Curator note: The first year the federal government published this measure. Before 2006 the rate was computed against employment rather than hours worked, and before 1992 there was no federal census of workplace deaths at all — so 2006 is where the line can start, not where the risk began.
Source note: Transcribed from the nineteen per-year workbooks this page links (fatal-occupational-injuries-hours-based-rates-YYYY.xlsx, 2006-2024), Total row, 'Fatal injury rate' column. The workbooks' column layout changes three times across the span, so the extraction locates that column by header text; a fixed index silently reads total hours as the rate for 2017 and 2018. Values cross-checked against the data labels on the rate chart in the archived CFOI charts package (1992-2017): all twelve overlapping years reproduce exactly. Rate = (fatal work injuries / total hours worked) x 200,000,000, the base for 100,000 full-time equivalents. Two limits are structural, not archival: CFOI has covered all 50 states and DC only since 1992, so no federal census of workplace deaths exists before then; and BLS moved the rate from an employment basis to an hours basis in 2006, so earlier rates measure something else and are not chained here. NOTE ON THE LINK CHECK: bls.gov returns 403 to clients whose User-Agent carries no contact address, so CI reports this source as bot-blocked and its expect-markers are NOT verified there — they were verified locally on 2026-09-01 against the served page.
Assumption: The composite family
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities program, 2025 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Curator note: The first year the federal government published this measure. Before 2006 the rate was computed against employment rather than hours worked, and before 1992 there was no federal census of workplace deaths at all — so 2006 is where the line can start, not where the risk began.
Source note: Transcribed from the nineteen per-year workbooks this page links (fatal-occupational-injuries-hours-based-rates-YYYY.xlsx, 2006-2024), Total row, 'Fatal injury rate' column. The workbooks' column layout changes three times across the span, so the extraction locates that column by header text; a fixed index silently reads total hours as the rate for 2017 and 2018. Values cross-checked against the data labels on the rate chart in the archived CFOI charts package (1992-2017): all twelve overlapping years reproduce exactly. Rate = (fatal work injuries / total hours worked) x 200,000,000, the base for 100,000 full-time equivalents. Two limits are structural, not archival: CFOI has covered all 50 states and DC only since 1992, so no federal census of workplace deaths exists before then; and BLS moved the rate from an employment basis to an hours basis in 2006, so earlier rates measure something else and are not chained here. NOTE ON THE LINK CHECK: bls.gov returns 403 to clients whose User-Agent carries no contact address, so CI reports this source as bot-blocked and its expect-markers are NOT verified there — they were verified locally on 2026-09-01 against the served page.
Assumption: The composite family
6.9 per 1,000 live birthsA
Infant mortality rate, 2000observed record
deaths under age 1 per 1,000 live births
Population measuredU.S. resident population (death certificates)
Source recordNational Center for Health Statistics (CDC) · 2024 · Tier A
Full record
National Vital Statistics System: Life Tables and Infant Mortality
National Center for Health Statistics (CDC), 2024 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Curator note: From NCHS, Health, United States, 2016, Table 11. All races. Neonatal: 4.6; postneonatal: 2.3. The rate was essentially flat from 2000-2005 before resuming decline.
Source note: NCHS publishes annual life tables via the National Vital Statistics Reports series. Life expectancy at birth (all races): 1960: 69.7 total / 66.6M / 73.1F; 1970: 70.8 / 67.1M / 74.8F; 1980: 73.7 / 70.0M / 77.5F; 1990: 75.4 / 71.8M / 78.8F; 2000: 77.0 / 74.3M / 79.7F; 2010: 78.7 / 76.2M / 81.0F; 2023: 78.4 / 75.8M / 81.1F (Data Brief No. 521). 2024 provisional: 79.0 / 76.5M / 81.4F. Infant mortality rates (all races, per 1,000 live births) from Health, United States, 2016, Table 11: 1950: 29.2; 1960: 26.0; 1970: 20.0; 1980: 12.6; 1990: 9.2; 2000: 6.9; 2010: 6.1; 2015: 5.9. URL for infant mortality table: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/hus/2016/011.pdf
Assumption: The composite family
National Center for Health Statistics (CDC), 2024 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Curator note: From NCHS, Health, United States, 2016, Table 11. All races. Neonatal: 4.6; postneonatal: 2.3. The rate was essentially flat from 2000-2005 before resuming decline.
Source note: NCHS publishes annual life tables via the National Vital Statistics Reports series. Life expectancy at birth (all races): 1960: 69.7 total / 66.6M / 73.1F; 1970: 70.8 / 67.1M / 74.8F; 1980: 73.7 / 70.0M / 77.5F; 1990: 75.4 / 71.8M / 78.8F; 2000: 77.0 / 74.3M / 79.7F; 2010: 78.7 / 76.2M / 81.0F; 2023: 78.4 / 75.8M / 81.1F (Data Brief No. 521). 2024 provisional: 79.0 / 76.5M / 81.4F. Infant mortality rates (all races, per 1,000 live births) from Health, United States, 2016, Table 11: 1950: 29.2; 1960: 26.0; 1970: 20.0; 1980: 12.6; 1990: 9.2; 2000: 6.9; 2010: 6.1; 2015: 5.9. URL for infant mortality table: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/hus/2016/011.pdf
Assumption: The composite family
Men: 26.8, Women: 25.1A
Median age at first marriage, 2000observed record
years (median age at first marriage)
Population measuredU.S. civilian noninstitutionalized population (CPS/decennial census)
Source recordU.S. Census Bureau · 2023 · Tier A
Full record
Census Historical Table MS-2: Median Age at First Marriage
U.S. Census Bureau, 2023 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Curator note: From Census Table MS-2. CPS ASEC. Women crossed 25 — up nearly 5 years from the mid-century low. The composite family was forming 3-4 years later than in the 1950s.
Source note: Table MS-2: Median age at first marriage by sex, 1890 to present. Decennial census data 1890-2000; CPS data for intervening years and 2010+. File: ms2-median-age-first-marriage.xls. The median age at first marriage declined from ~26 (men) / ~22 (women) in 1890 to a mid-century low of ~22.5 / 20.3 in 1956, then rose steadily to ~30+ / ~28+ by 2023.
U.S. Census Bureau, 2023 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Curator note: From Census Table MS-2. CPS ASEC. Women crossed 25 — up nearly 5 years from the mid-century low. The composite family was forming 3-4 years later than in the 1950s.
Source note: Table MS-2: Median age at first marriage by sex, 1890 to present. Decennial census data 1890-2000; CPS data for intervening years and 2010+. File: ms2-median-age-first-marriage.xls. The median age at first marriage declined from ~26 (men) / ~22 (women) in 1890 to a mid-century low of ~22.5 / 20.3 in 1956, then rose steadily to ~30+ / ~28+ by 2023.
61.1%A
Married women's labor force participation, 2000observed record
% of married women (spouse present) in the civilian labor force
Population measuredU.S. civilian noninstitutional population 16+, by marital status (CPS annual averages)
Source recordU.S. Census Bureau (data from BLS Current Population Survey) · 2010 · Tier A
Full record
Statistical Abstract of the United States, Table 596: Labor Force Participation Rates by Marital Status, Sex, and Age
U.S. Census Bureau (data from BLS Current Population Survey), 2010 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Curator note: From Statistical Abstract Table 596 (11s0596.xls, BLS CPS annual averages). The peak era — 61.1% in 2000, essentially flat through 2009 (61.4%). LFPR plateaued in the 2000s after decades of rapid growth. From 5.6% (1900) to 61.1% (2000) — an elevenfold increase across the century.
Source note: Table 596 from the 2011 Statistical Abstract (130th edition). Annual averages of monthly CPS figures. Covers 1960-2009. 'Married, spouse present' = married civilians with spouse present in the household. File: 11s0596.xls (downloaded and verified). The series is the direct continuation of Historical Statistics Vol 1, Series D 49-62 (which ends at 1970). The 1970 figure (40.5%) is close to but not identical to the Hist Stats figure (40.8%) due to CPS processing differences.
U.S. Census Bureau (data from BLS Current Population Survey), 2010 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Curator note: From Statistical Abstract Table 596 (11s0596.xls, BLS CPS annual averages). The peak era — 61.1% in 2000, essentially flat through 2009 (61.4%). LFPR plateaued in the 2000s after decades of rapid growth. From 5.6% (1900) to 61.1% (2000) — an elevenfold increase across the century.
Source note: Table 596 from the 2011 Statistical Abstract (130th edition). Annual averages of monthly CPS figures. Covers 1960-2009. 'Married, spouse present' = married civilians with spouse present in the household. File: 11s0596.xls (downloaded and verified). The series is the direct continuation of Historical Statistics Vol 1, Series D 49-62 (which ends at 1970). The 1970 figure (40.5%) is close to but not identical to the Hist Stats figure (40.8%) due to CPS processing differences.
HS grad or more: 84.1%, Bachelor's or more: 25.6%, Less than 9th grade: 7.0%A
Educational attainment, 2000observed record
% of population 25+ (all races, both sexes)
Population measuredU.S. civilian noninstitutionalized population aged 25 and over (CPS/ACS)
Source recordU.S. Census Bureau · 2024 · Tier A
Full record
Census Historical Tables: Educational Attainment (Table A-1/A-2)
U.S. Census Bureau, 2024 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Curator note: From Census Table A-1. Decennial census. HS graduation crossed 84%. Less-than-9th-grade fell to 7% — down from 60% in 1940. Bachelor's or more crossed 25%. Median school years no longer reported after 1991 (Census switched to percentage-only measures).
Source note: Table A-1: Years of school completed by age and sex (1940-present). Table A-2: Percent of population 25+ with specified years of school completed (high school graduate or more, bachelor's degree or more). 1940-2000 data from decennial census; 2001+ from CPS ASEC. Data series updated annually. Files: taba-1-educational-attainment.xlsx, taba-2-pct-high-school.xlsx. URL CORRECTION 2026-08-14: the old /data/tables/time-series/demo/educational-attainment.html deep link now redirects to the generic /data/tables.html landing (caught by the redirect advisory); repointed at the Educational Attainment topic page, which links the A-1/A-2 time-series tables.
U.S. Census Bureau, 2024 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Curator note: From Census Table A-1. Decennial census. HS graduation crossed 84%. Less-than-9th-grade fell to 7% — down from 60% in 1940. Bachelor's or more crossed 25%. Median school years no longer reported after 1991 (Census switched to percentage-only measures).
Source note: Table A-1: Years of school completed by age and sex (1940-present). Table A-2: Percent of population 25+ with specified years of school completed (high school graduate or more, bachelor's degree or more). 1940-2000 data from decennial census; 2001+ from CPS ASEC. Data series updated annually. Files: taba-1-educational-attainment.xlsx, taba-2-pct-high-school.xlsx. URL CORRECTION 2026-08-14: the old /data/tables/time-series/demo/educational-attainment.html deep link now redirects to the generic /data/tables.html landing (caught by the redirect advisory); repointed at the Educational Attainment topic page, which links the A-1/A-2 time-series tables.
$139,700 (139.7 thousand, 2016 dollars)A
Median family net worth, 2007observed record
median net worth, all families (SCF)
Population measuredU.S. families (survey sample, ~6,500 families per wave)
Source recordBoard of Governors of the Federal Reserve System · 2022 · Tier A
Full record
Federal Reserve Survey of Consumer Finances
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, 2022 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Curator note: From SCF Chartbook (bulletincharts.pdf). 2007 survey, in 2016 dollars. The peak before the Great Recession — up from $117,300 in 2001. The housing bubble inflated median net worth to its highest level in the SCF series. By 2010 it would collapse to $85,400 (−39%) as home values and stock markets crashed.
Source note: Triennial survey of U.S. family finances. Provides median and mean net worth by income quintile, age, family structure. Full asset/liability composition: home equity, vehicles, financial assets (deposits, stocks, retirement accounts), business equity, and debt (mortgage, credit cards, installment loans). Survey years: 1983, 1989, 1992, 1995, 1998, 2001, 2004, 2007, 2010, 2013, 2016, 2019, 2022. Interactive tables at federalreserve.gov/econres/scf/dataviz/scf/table/. Tier A (official survey).
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, 2022 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Curator note: From SCF Chartbook (bulletincharts.pdf). 2007 survey, in 2016 dollars. The peak before the Great Recession — up from $117,300 in 2001. The housing bubble inflated median net worth to its highest level in the SCF series. By 2010 it would collapse to $85,400 (−39%) as home values and stock markets crashed.
Source note: Triennial survey of U.S. family finances. Provides median and mean net worth by income quintile, age, family structure. Full asset/liability composition: home equity, vehicles, financial assets (deposits, stocks, retirement accounts), business equity, and debt (mortgage, credit cards, installment loans). Survey years: 1983, 1989, 1992, 1995, 1998, 2001, 2004, 2007, 2010, 2013, 2016, 2019, 2022. Interactive tables at federalreserve.gov/econres/scf/dataviz/scf/table/. Tier A (official survey).
34.3A
Average weekly hours, total private production and nonsupervisory employees, 2000observed record
hours per week
Population measuredProduction and nonsupervisory employees, total private sector
Source recordFederal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (source: BLS Current Employment Statistics) · 2024 · Tier A
Full record
Average Weekly Hours of Production and Nonsupervisory Employees, Total Private (AWHNONAG)
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (source: BLS Current Employment Statistics), 2024 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Curator note: Arithmetic mean of twelve monthly seasonally adjusted observations for 2000, retrieved from the BLS Public Data API on 2026-09-07. The saved response and all month/year labels are audit inputs.
Source note: Monthly, seasonally adjusted; BLS series CES0500000007. Annual room observations are equal-weight means of all twelve months. Exact public BLS API responses retrieved 2026-09-07 are saved in the local archive and bound by audits.
Assumption: The composite family
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (source: BLS Current Employment Statistics), 2024 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Curator note: Arithmetic mean of twelve monthly seasonally adjusted observations for 2000, retrieved from the BLS Public Data API on 2026-09-07. The saved response and all month/year labels are audit inputs.
Source note: Monthly, seasonally adjusted; BLS series CES0500000007. Annual room observations are equal-weight means of all twelve months. Exact public BLS API responses retrieved 2026-09-07 are saved in the local archive and bound by audits.
Assumption: The composite family
$14.31A
Average hourly earnings, manufacturing production workers, 2000observed record
USD per hour, nominal
Population measuredProduction and nonsupervisory employees in manufacturing
Source recordFederal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (source: BLS Current Employment Statistics) · 2024 · Tier A
Full record
Average Hourly Earnings of Production and Nonsupervisory Employees, Manufacturing (CES3000000008)
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (source: BLS Current Employment Statistics), 2024 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Basis: Hourly rate
Curator note: Arithmetic mean of twelve monthly seasonally adjusted observations for 2000, retrieved from the BLS Public Data API on 2026-09-07. The saved response and all month/year labels are audit inputs.
Source note: Coverage: 1939–present, monthly. Manufacturing-only earnings series; AHETPI starts in 1964 but covers the broader total-private population. 1950 annual average: $1.32/hour. CSV API: https://fred.stlouisfed.org/graph/fredgraph.csv?id=CES3000000008.
Assumption: Values are shown in period money
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (source: BLS Current Employment Statistics), 2024 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Basis: Hourly rate
Curator note: Arithmetic mean of twelve monthly seasonally adjusted observations for 2000, retrieved from the BLS Public Data API on 2026-09-07. The saved response and all month/year labels are audit inputs.
Source note: Coverage: 1939–present, monthly. Manufacturing-only earnings series; AHETPI starts in 1964 but covers the broader total-private population. 1950 annual average: $1.32/hour. CSV API: https://fred.stlouisfed.org/graph/fredgraph.csv?id=CES3000000008.
Assumption: Values are shown in period money
41.2A
Average weekly hours, manufacturing production workers, 2000observed record
hours per week
Population measuredProduction and nonsupervisory employees in manufacturing
Source recordFederal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (source: BLS Current Employment Statistics) · 2024 · Tier A
Full record
Average Weekly Hours of Production and Nonsupervisory Employees, Manufacturing (AWHMAN)
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (source: BLS Current Employment Statistics), 2024 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Curator note: Arithmetic mean of twelve monthly seasonally adjusted observations for 2000, retrieved from the BLS Public Data API on 2026-09-07. The saved response and all month/year labels are audit inputs.
Source note: Coverage: Jan 1939–present, monthly. BLS source code: CES3000000007. CSV API: https://fred.stlouisfed.org/graph/fredgraph.csv?id=AWHMAN. 1950 annual average: 40.5 hours. 2024 annual average: 40.7 hours.
Assumption: The composite family
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (source: BLS Current Employment Statistics), 2024 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Curator note: Arithmetic mean of twelve monthly seasonally adjusted observations for 2000, retrieved from the BLS Public Data API on 2026-09-07. The saved response and all month/year labels are audit inputs.
Source note: Coverage: Jan 1939–present, monthly. BLS source code: CES3000000007. CSV API: https://fred.stlouisfed.org/graph/fredgraph.csv?id=AWHMAN. 1950 annual average: 40.5 hours. 2024 annual average: 40.7 hours.
Assumption: The composite family
What had arrived
6 observations · 0 gapsInternet: 46% (2000) → 79% (2009). Broadband: ~5% (2000) → 63% (2009).A
Internet and broadband adoption, 2000sobserved record
% of adults
Population measuredU.S. adults (survey samples)
Source recordPew Research Center · 2025 · Tier A
Full record
Pew Research Center: Internet & Broadband Fact Sheet
Pew Research Center, 2025 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Curator note: From Pew Research Center. Internet adoption crossed 50% around 2001. Broadband (DSL/cable) replaced dial-up through the 2000s. By 2009, 63% of adults had home broadband. The smartphone era began with the iPhone (2007) but mass adoption belongs to the 2010s.
Source note: Pew's Internet & Technology program tracks internet, broadband, and smartphone adoption via periodic surveys. Compiles time-series adoption percentages. Coverage: ~2000-present. Pew 403-blocks automated requests — URL valid, access via browser.
Pew Research Center, 2025 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Curator note: From Pew Research Center. Internet adoption crossed 50% around 2001. Broadband (DSL/cable) replaced dial-up through the 2000s. By 2009, 63% of adults had home broadband. The smartphone era began with the iPhone (2007) but mass adoption belongs to the 2010s.
Source note: Pew's Internet & Technology program tracks internet, broadband, and smartphone adoption via periodic surveys. Compiles time-series adoption percentages. Coverage: ~2000-present. Pew 403-blocks automated requests — URL valid, access via browser.
~40% (2000) → ~85% (2009)A
Cell phone adoption, 2000sobserved record
% of adults who own a cell phone
Population measuredU.S. adults (survey samples)
Source recordPew Research Center · 2025 · Tier A
Full record
Pew Research Center: Internet & Broadband Fact Sheet
Pew Research Center, 2025 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Curator note: From Pew Research Center. Cell phone adoption was rapid: ~40% in 2000, ~65% in 2004, ~85% by 2009. The iPhone (2007) and Android (2008) began the smartphone transition.
Source note: Pew's Internet & Technology program tracks internet, broadband, and smartphone adoption via periodic surveys. Compiles time-series adoption percentages. Coverage: ~2000-present. Pew 403-blocks automated requests — URL valid, access via browser.
Pew Research Center, 2025 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Curator note: From Pew Research Center. Cell phone adoption was rapid: ~40% in 2000, ~65% in 2004, ~85% by 2009. The iPhone (2007) and Android (2008) began the smartphone transition.
Source note: Pew's Internet & Technology program tracks internet, broadband, and smartphone adoption via periodic surveys. Compiles time-series adoption percentages. Coverage: ~2000-present. Pew 403-blocks automated requests — URL valid, access via browser.
87% of homes had AC (61% central AC)A
Air conditioning, 2009 (RECS)observed record
% of occupied housing units with air conditioning
Population measuredU.S. housing units (sampled)
Source recordU.S. Energy Information Administration · 2020 · Tier A
Full record
Residential Energy Consumption Survey (RECS)
U.S. Energy Information Administration, 2020 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Curator note: From the 2009 RECS. 87% of US homes used air conditioning — up from 68% in 1993. Central AC alone reached 61% (nearly tripled from 23% in 1978). AC was approaching universality. By 2015, AC remained at 87%, and by 2020, reached 88%. Source: EIA RECS 2009.
Source note: Started 1978, triennial/quadrennial. Tracks appliance ownership (refrigerator, washing machine, air conditioning) and housing characteristics. AC diffusion: 1993 RECS 68%, 2009 RECS 87%, 2015 RECS 87%. Useful for diffusion and home panels as complement to AHS.
U.S. Energy Information Administration, 2020 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Curator note: From the 2009 RECS. 87% of US homes used air conditioning — up from 68% in 1993. Central AC alone reached 61% (nearly tripled from 23% in 1978). AC was approaching universality. By 2015, AC remained at 87%, and by 2020, reached 88%. Source: EIA RECS 2009.
Source note: Started 1978, triennial/quadrennial. Tracks appliance ownership (refrigerator, washing machine, air conditioning) and housing characteristics. AC diffusion: 1993 RECS 68%, 2009 RECS 87%, 2015 RECS 87%. Useful for diffusion and home panels as complement to AHS.
65.3 million basic cable subscribers (~59% of TV households)A
Households with cable TV, 2006observed record
subscribers (% of TV households with cable, FCC 13th Report)
Population measuredU.S. households subscribing to multichannel video programming distributor (MVPD) services
Source recordFederal Communications Commission · 2017 · Tier A
Full record
Annual Assessment of the Status of Competition in the Market for the Delivery of Video Programming (FCC Reports, 1994–2017)
Federal Communications Commission, 2017 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Curator note: From FCC 13th Annual Video Competition Report (FCC 07-206, data as of June 2006). 110.2M TV households, 95.8M subscribed to MVPD (87%). Cable's share of MVPD: 68.2% = 65.3M basic subscribers. Cable penetration of all TV households: ~59%. This was near the peak — cord-cutting began around 2013. Up from 60% (1992). By 2015: 53.2M subscribers (declining).
Source note: FCC's annual report on video competition. Subscriber data from SNL Kagan (industry analyst). Key data: 1992: 59.3% of TV households (55.2M subscribers, FCC 97-423 Table B-1, local archive ~/vitrine-research/09-fcc/fcc97423.pdf). 1997: 64.2M cable, 73.6M total MVPD, 75.9% of TV households (FCC 1997 report). 2006: 65.3M basic cable, 95.8M total MVPD, 87% of TV households (FCC 07-206, 13th Report, local archive ~/vitrine-research/09-fcc/FCC-07-206A1.txt). 2015: 53.2M cable (53.1% of MVPD), 33.1M DBS, 13.0M telco, 99.4M total MVPD (FCC DA 17-71, 2017, local archive ~/vitrine-research/09-fcc/DA-17-71A1.pdf). MVPD subscriber losses began 2013 — cord-cutting era. Cable's share of MVPD declined from 89% (1997) to 68.2% (2006) to 53.1% (2015). The landing page at fcc.gov/general/media-bureau-reports-industry links to all annual reports; individual report years cited in fact notes.
Federal Communications Commission, 2017 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Curator note: From FCC 13th Annual Video Competition Report (FCC 07-206, data as of June 2006). 110.2M TV households, 95.8M subscribed to MVPD (87%). Cable's share of MVPD: 68.2% = 65.3M basic subscribers. Cable penetration of all TV households: ~59%. This was near the peak — cord-cutting began around 2013. Up from 60% (1992). By 2015: 53.2M subscribers (declining).
Source note: FCC's annual report on video competition. Subscriber data from SNL Kagan (industry analyst). Key data: 1992: 59.3% of TV households (55.2M subscribers, FCC 97-423 Table B-1, local archive ~/vitrine-research/09-fcc/fcc97423.pdf). 1997: 64.2M cable, 73.6M total MVPD, 75.9% of TV households (FCC 1997 report). 2006: 65.3M basic cable, 95.8M total MVPD, 87% of TV households (FCC 07-206, 13th Report, local archive ~/vitrine-research/09-fcc/FCC-07-206A1.txt). 2015: 53.2M cable (53.1% of MVPD), 33.1M DBS, 13.0M telco, 99.4M total MVPD (FCC DA 17-71, 2017, local archive ~/vitrine-research/09-fcc/DA-17-71A1.pdf). MVPD subscriber losses began 2013 — cord-cutting era. Cable's share of MVPD declined from 89% (1997) to 68.2% (2006) to 53.1% (2015). The landing page at fcc.gov/general/media-bureau-reports-industry links to all annual reports; individual report years cited in fact notes.
89.7% (10.3% with no vehicle); avg 1.9 vehicles per householdA
Households with at least one vehicle, 2000observed record
% of occupied housing units with 1+ vehicles
Population measuredAll U.S. occupied housing units
Source recordU.S. Department of Transportation, Bureau of Transportation Statistics · 2024 · Tier A
Full record
Share of Households by Vehicles Available: 1960-2023 (BTS Figure 2-7)
U.S. Department of Transportation, Bureau of Transportation Statistics, 2024 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Curator note: From BTS Figure 2-7 (Census Bureau decennial census, 2000). 10.3% had no vehicle, 34.2% had one, 38.4% had two, 17.1% had three or more. Near-saturation — only one in ten households remained car-free. By 2010: 90.9%. Population: all occupied housing units.
Source note: Data compiled by BTS from U.S. Census Bureau Decennial Census (1960-2000) and American Community Survey (2010-2023). Table B08201 (Household Size by Vehicles Available). Excel file: F2-7 Share of Household by Vehicle Available.xlsx. Figures verified against the Census Bureau source data. The 1960-2000 data are from the decennial census long form; 2010+ from ACS. The concept is consistent across the span: '% of occupied housing units with N vehicles available.'
U.S. Department of Transportation, Bureau of Transportation Statistics, 2024 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Curator note: From BTS Figure 2-7 (Census Bureau decennial census, 2000). 10.3% had no vehicle, 34.2% had one, 38.4% had two, 17.1% had three or more. Near-saturation — only one in ten households remained car-free. By 2010: 90.9%. Population: all occupied housing units.
Source note: Data compiled by BTS from U.S. Census Bureau Decennial Census (1960-2000) and American Community Survey (2010-2023). Table B08201 (Household Size by Vehicles Available). Excel file: F2-7 Share of Household by Vehicle Available.xlsx. Figures verified against the Census Bureau source data. The 1960-2000 data are from the decennial census long form; 2010+ from ACS. The concept is consistent across the span: '% of occupied housing units with N vehicles available.'
38% of households had a DVR (2010-11), up from 19% in 2007-08B
DVR penetration, 2010-11observed record
% of households with digital video recorder
Population measuredU.S. households subscribing to multichannel video programming distributor (MVPD) services
Source recordFederal Communications Commission · 2017 · Tier B
Full record
Annual Assessment of the Status of Competition in the Market for the Delivery of Video Programming (FCC Reports, 1994–2017)
Federal Communications Commission, 2017 · source
Confidence: B — Official microdata (computed)
Curator note: From FCC 15th Video Competition Report (FCC 12-81). DVR penetration doubled in three years. HDTV households reached 64% in 2010-11, up from 25% in 2007-08. DTV average price fell from $3,147 (1998) to $1,043 (2006), a 67% decline.
Source note: FCC's annual report on video competition. Subscriber data from SNL Kagan (industry analyst). Key data: 1992: 59.3% of TV households (55.2M subscribers, FCC 97-423 Table B-1, local archive ~/vitrine-research/09-fcc/fcc97423.pdf). 1997: 64.2M cable, 73.6M total MVPD, 75.9% of TV households (FCC 1997 report). 2006: 65.3M basic cable, 95.8M total MVPD, 87% of TV households (FCC 07-206, 13th Report, local archive ~/vitrine-research/09-fcc/FCC-07-206A1.txt). 2015: 53.2M cable (53.1% of MVPD), 33.1M DBS, 13.0M telco, 99.4M total MVPD (FCC DA 17-71, 2017, local archive ~/vitrine-research/09-fcc/DA-17-71A1.pdf). MVPD subscriber losses began 2013 — cord-cutting era. Cable's share of MVPD declined from 89% (1997) to 68.2% (2006) to 53.1% (2015). The landing page at fcc.gov/general/media-bureau-reports-industry links to all annual reports; individual report years cited in fact notes.
Assumption: The composite family
Federal Communications Commission, 2017 · source
Confidence: B — Official microdata (computed)
Curator note: From FCC 15th Video Competition Report (FCC 12-81). DVR penetration doubled in three years. HDTV households reached 64% in 2010-11, up from 25% in 2007-08. DTV average price fell from $3,147 (1998) to $1,043 (2006), a 67% decline.
Source note: FCC's annual report on video competition. Subscriber data from SNL Kagan (industry analyst). Key data: 1992: 59.3% of TV households (55.2M subscribers, FCC 97-423 Table B-1, local archive ~/vitrine-research/09-fcc/fcc97423.pdf). 1997: 64.2M cable, 73.6M total MVPD, 75.9% of TV households (FCC 1997 report). 2006: 65.3M basic cable, 95.8M total MVPD, 87% of TV households (FCC 07-206, 13th Report, local archive ~/vitrine-research/09-fcc/FCC-07-206A1.txt). 2015: 53.2M cable (53.1% of MVPD), 33.1M DBS, 13.0M telco, 99.4M total MVPD (FCC DA 17-71, 2017, local archive ~/vitrine-research/09-fcc/DA-17-71A1.pdf). MVPD subscriber losses began 2013 — cord-cutting era. Cable's share of MVPD declined from 89% (1997) to 68.2% (2006) to 53.1% (2015). The landing page at fcc.gov/general/media-bureau-reports-industry links to all annual reports; individual report years cited in fact notes.
Assumption: The composite family
A day's work buys
4 observations · 0 gaps2.36 years ($119,600 home vs $50,730 income)C
Median home value as years of median family income, 2000observed record
years of median family income (nominal)
Population measuredOwner-occupied housing units, median value (decennial census, nominal/unadjusted dollars), U.S. and by state
Source recordU.S. Census Bureau · 2000 · Tier C
Full record
Historical Census of Housing Tables: Home Values (Unadjusted)
U.S. Census Bureau, 2000 · source
Confidence: C — Reconstructed from period surveys
Curator note: Computed: 2000 median home value ($119,600) / 2000 median family income ($50,730). The housing bubble (2002-2006) would push this ratio far higher before the crash.
Source note: Median value of owner-occupied homes, unadjusted (nominal) dollars, decennial 1940-2000. National medians: 1940 $2,938; 1950 $7,354; 1960 $11,900; 1970 $17,000; 1980 $47,200; 1990 $79,100; 2000 $119,600. Companion to the Census homeownership history table (census-homeownership-historical); distinct table (values, not rates). Modern values (2010+) come from ACS B25077 (census-acs-homevalue).
Assumption: The affordability axis
Assumption: Values are shown in period money
U.S. Census Bureau, 2000 · source
Confidence: C — Reconstructed from period surveys
Curator note: Computed: 2000 median home value ($119,600) / 2000 median family income ($50,730). The housing bubble (2002-2006) would push this ratio far higher before the crash.
Source note: Median value of owner-occupied homes, unadjusted (nominal) dollars, decennial 1940-2000. National medians: 1940 $2,938; 1950 $7,354; 1960 $11,900; 1970 $17,000; 1980 $47,200; 1990 $79,100; 2000 $119,600. Companion to the Census homeownership history table (census-homeownership-historical); distinct table (values, not rates). Modern values (2010+) come from ACS B25077 (census-acs-homevalue).
Assumption: The affordability axis
Assumption: Values are shown in period money
CPI 172.2 (2000) → 313.7 (2024) = 1.8x. $1 in 2000 = $1.82 in 2024. Real median family income grew 1.14x.A
Consumer Price Index and purchasing power, 2000observed record
CPI-U (1982-84=100), annual average
Population measuredAll Urban Consumers (CPI-U)
Source recordU.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics · 2024 · Tier A
Full record
Consumer Price Index (CPI)
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2024 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Curator note: CPI from BLS series CUUR0000SA0 (confirmed via BLS API). 2000: 172.2. 2024: 313.7. Ratio: 1.82x. Nominal median family income: $50,730 (2000) → $105,800 (2024) = 2.09x. Real growth: 2.09/1.82 = 1.14x — the weakest real income growth of any postwar decade, reflecting two recessions (2001, 2008-09) and the housing crash.
Source note: BLS CPI homepage. Historical data and supplemental files at https://www.bls.gov/cpi/tables/supplemental-files/. BLS 403-blocks automated requests — URL valid, access via browser. Historical article: https://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2014/article/one-hundred-years-of-price-change-the-consumer-price-index-and-the-american-inflation-experience.htm
Assumption: Values are shown in period money
Assumption: The affordability axis
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2024 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Curator note: CPI from BLS series CUUR0000SA0 (confirmed via BLS API). 2000: 172.2. 2024: 313.7. Ratio: 1.82x. Nominal median family income: $50,730 (2000) → $105,800 (2024) = 2.09x. Real growth: 2.09/1.82 = 1.14x — the weakest real income growth of any postwar decade, reflecting two recessions (2001, 2008-09) and the housing crash.
Source note: BLS CPI homepage. Historical data and supplemental files at https://www.bls.gov/cpi/tables/supplemental-files/. BLS 403-blocks automated requests — URL valid, access via browser. Historical article: https://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2014/article/one-hundred-years-of-price-change-the-consumer-price-index-and-the-american-inflation-experience.htm
Assumption: Values are shown in period money
Assumption: The affordability axis
$480.54/week — a full year of it (×52) ≈ 49% of median family incomeA
What a week of work bought, 2000observed record
weekly earnings vs annual median family income
Population measuredProduction and nonsupervisory employees, total private sector
Source recordFederal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (source: BLS Current Employment Statistics) · 2024 · Tier A
Full record
Average Hourly Earnings of Production and Nonsupervisory Employees, Total Private (AHETPI)
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (source: BLS Current Employment Statistics), 2024 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Curator note: The product of the rounded hourly wage and weekly-hours observations for total-private production and nonsupervisory employees is $480.54. Assuming 52 paid weeks gives $24,988.08, or 49.3% of the all-family median income of $50,730 (Census F-8). Worker and family survey populations differ. This illustrative ratio does not establish household needs, income sufficiency, or the number of earners in a family.
Source note: Average (not median) hourly earnings. Coverage: 1964-present, monthly. BLS source code: CES0500000008. Used as an explicitly average wage benchmark in the work-buys panel; it does not identify median worker purchasing power.
Assumption: The composite family
Assumption: Values are shown in period money
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (source: BLS Current Employment Statistics), 2024 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Curator note: The product of the rounded hourly wage and weekly-hours observations for total-private production and nonsupervisory employees is $480.54. Assuming 52 paid weeks gives $24,988.08, or 49.3% of the all-family median income of $50,730 (Census F-8). Worker and family survey populations differ. This illustrative ratio does not establish household needs, income sufficiency, or the number of earners in a family.
Source note: Average (not median) hourly earnings. Coverage: 1964-present, monthly. BLS source code: CES0500000008. Used as an explicitly average wage benchmark in the work-buys panel; it does not identify median worker purchasing power.
Assumption: The composite family
Assumption: Values are shown in period money
$21,030A
Average new car transaction price, 2000observed record
USD, nominal (average transaction price, domestic + import)
Population measuredAll new passenger cars sold in the United States (domestic and import), excluding pickups, vans, and SUVs
Source recordU.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis · 2021 · Tier A
Full record
Average Transaction Price per New Car (Domestic and Import), 1970-2020
U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis, 2021 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Basis: One-time price
Affordability anchors: Production and nonsupervisory employees, total private sector; All US families by family size (2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7+ persons), CPS money income
Denominators measure: hours axis: average hourly earnings; income axis: total money income
Curator note: From BEA Average Transaction Price per New Car (ORNL TEDB Table 11.13). Steady price increases continued, driven by technology content and safety features. Note: this series excludes SUVs and light trucks, which captured an increasing market share in the 2000s — the average transaction price including all vehicle types would be higher. Population: all new passenger cars sold in the US.
Source note: Compiled in Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Transportation Energy Data Book, Edition 40, Table 11.13. Data are based on an average car and do not include prices for pickups, vans, or sport utility vehicles. Annual average transaction prices in current dollars. Total (domestic + import) current-dollar prices: 1970 $3,543, 1980 $7,557, 1990 $15,033, 2000 $21,030, 2010 $24,907, 2020 $27,366.
Assumption: Values are shown in period money
U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis, 2021 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Basis: One-time price
Affordability anchors: Production and nonsupervisory employees, total private sector; All US families by family size (2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7+ persons), CPS money income
Denominators measure: hours axis: average hourly earnings; income axis: total money income
Curator note: From BEA Average Transaction Price per New Car (ORNL TEDB Table 11.13). Steady price increases continued, driven by technology content and safety features. Note: this series excludes SUVs and light trucks, which captured an increasing market share in the 2000s — the average transaction price including all vehicle types would be higher. Population: all new passenger cars sold in the US.
Source note: Compiled in Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Transportation Energy Data Book, Edition 40, Table 11.13. Data are based on an average car and do not include prices for pickups, vans, or sport utility vehicles. Annual average transaction prices in current dollars. Total (domestic + import) current-dollar prices: 1970 $3,543, 1980 $7,557, 1990 $15,033, 2000 $21,030, 2010 $24,907, 2020 $27,366.
Assumption: Values are shown in period money
Computed affordability
≈ 1,501 hours of work
≈ 33.6% of annual income
Confidence & flags
A — official statistical series
B — official microdata, computed by this project
C — reconstructed from period surveys
D — scholarly estimate
Gap — no reliable record; shown as the gap it is
Reading the atlas
Provenance is in the scan-line: every exhibit's row names its value, confidence tier, the population actually measured, and the source record. Chart points and stage glyphs open the same record.
Rising series draw in petrol, falling in ember. An omitted illustration means no exhibit was selected, not that the object was historically absent.