vitrinethe median family's century

vitrine · US · room 2 of 13

The 1910s room

The composite family. Each room is a statistical composite, assembled from separate distributions with separate sources. The family at the median income did not also have the median house, the median car, and the median diet. No single family described here ever existed; each fact tells you, in its provenance drawer, which real population it was measured from.
Structural gapFour core exhibits — income, housing, the food basket, and work-buys — lack a reliable national record for this room. Their gaps are shown, not reconstructed from neighboring decades.
Stop 01 · The home no reliable record accessible onlineHome value, rooms, plumbing, electricity D Stop 02 · The budget no reliable record accessible onlineMedian family income, 1910s D Stop 03 · The day $0.260/hr, 56.6 hrs/week, ~$14.72/wkManufacturing production worker wages, 1910 A Stop 04 · What had arrived Electricity ~5-10% of homes (urban only). Radio not yet commercial. Aut…Electricity, radio, automobile C
era-graded wash · absent technology isn't drawn · every glyph opens its record

The complete room

All six ledgers, including the curator's route above and the records around it. Value, tier, measured population, and source on every line.

18 sourced facts

The home

3 exhibits
45.9%A

Homeownership rate, 1910observed record

% of occupied dwelling units (owner-occupied)

Population measuredAll U.S. occupied housing units (decennial census) Source recordU.S. Census Bureau · 2000 · Tier A
Full record
Homeownership Rate by State: 1900 to 2000
U.S. Census Bureau, 2000 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Curator note: From Census Bureau decennial time series (owner.pdf). Down from 46.7% in 1900 — the long slow decline from 1900 to 1920. By 1920: 45.6%.
Source note: Time series of homeownership rates from 1900 to 2000 by state and nationally. 1950 national rate: 55.0%. 1940: 43.6%. 1960: 61.9%. Also see companion table: https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/decennial/tables/time-series/census-housing-tables/ownerchar.pdf
Assumption: The composite family
record
no reliable record accessible onlineD

Home value, rooms, plumbing, electricitydocumented gap

n/a

Population measuredAll US housing units and residents (decennial census) Source recordU.S. Census Bureau · 2024 · Tier D
Full record
Census of Population and Housing — Decennial Publications
U.S. Census Bureau, 2024 · source
Confidence: D — Scholarly estimate
Curator note: The 1910 Census did not collect housing characteristics. The first Census of Housing was 1940. Most urban homes in the 1910s had electricity (~85% of urban/non-farm by 1920); rural homes were almost entirely unelectrified (~2% of farms in 1910). Indoor plumbing was available in cities but rare in rural areas.
Source note: Historical Census publications. Census of Housing 1940 was first to ask about amenities (plumbing, electricity, radio, refrigerator). Census 1930 asked about radio ownership — first census technology-diffusion question. Census 1950/1960 asked about TV, telephone, automobile, refrigerator, washing machine.
record
23.3 in 1919, up from 21.0 in 1913A

Rent, 1919 (index, 1982-84=100)observed record

CPI-U rent-of-primary-residence index (1982-84=100), annual average

Population measuredDepends on series (CPI: all urban consumers; food prices: urban consumers) Source recordU.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics · 2024 · Tier A
Full record
BLS Public Data API v2
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2024 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Curator note: BLS series CUUR0000SEHA. Rent rose just 11% across the war years — 21.0 in 1913 to 23.3 in 1919 — while food rose 86% and apparel 143%. Rent is the stickiest line in the household budget: leases are annual, and housing stock cannot be produced quickly. The lag reversed in the 1920s, when rents kept climbing after other prices collapsed.
Source note: Direct API access to BLS time series. Used for: average food prices (APU series), CPI-U (CUUR0000SA0), wage and hours data. API key registered. Food price series (APU) available from ~1970s onward — no 1950 data. Rate limit: 100 queries/day for registered users.
Assumption: The composite family
record

The budget

2 exhibits
no reliable record accessible onlineD

Median family income, 1910sdocumented gap

n/a

Population measuredAll US families (two or more related persons), CPS money income Source recordU.S. Census Bureau · 2024 · Tier D
Full record
Historical Income Tables: Families
U.S. Census Bureau, 2024 · source
Confidence: D — Scholarly estimate
Curator note: No national income survey existed before 1947. The Census of Manufactures collected wage data but not family income. The first CPS income question was 1945 (P-60 No. 1). For 1910, the best available proxy is manufacturing wages: $0.260/hr, ~56.6 hrs/week (Historical Statistics Vol 1, Series D 765). See day panel.
Source note: Landing page listing Tables F-1 through F-23. Continuously updated. Last revision Sep 2025 (2024 data).
record
36.2 in 1919, up from 14.9 in 1913A

Clothing prices, 1919 (index, 1982-84=100)observed record

CPI-U apparel index (1982-84=100), annual average

Population measuredDepends on series (CPI: all urban consumers; food prices: urban consumers) Source recordU.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics · 2024 · Tier A
Full record
BLS Public Data API v2
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2024 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Curator note: BLS series CUUR0000SAA. Clothing was the most violently inflated thing the family bought during the war: 14.9 in 1913 to 36.2 in 1919, +143%, and still climbing to 43.1 in 1920 before collapsing. Wartime demand for wool and cotton, and the diversion of textile capacity to uniforms, fell directly on a household expense that could be deferred but not avoided.
Source note: Direct API access to BLS time series. Used for: average food prices (APU series), CPI-U (CUUR0000SA0), wage and hours data. API key registered. Food price series (APU) available from ~1970s onward — no 1950 data. Rate limit: 100 queries/day for registered users.
Assumption: The composite family
record

The table

3 exhibits
no reliable record accessible onlineD

The food basket, 1910sdocumented gap

n/a

Population measured2,567 wage-earner families in 33 states, head earning <=$1,200/year, year 1901 Source recordU.S. Department of Commerce and Labor, Bureau of Labor · 1903 · Tier D
Full record
BLS Bulletin No. 49: Cost of Living and Retail Prices of Food (18th Annual Report of the Commissioner of Labor)
U.S. Department of Commerce and Labor, Bureau of Labor, 1903 · source
Confidence: D — Scholarly estimate
Curator note: The BLS Bulletin No. 49 (1903) and 18th Annual Report (1903) cover the 1900s. No comparable survey exists for the 1910s. The next major consumer expenditure survey would be the 1918-19 study, conducted during wartime.
Source note: Primary source for 1900s room. Average income $827.19, average expenditure $768.54, food $326.90 (42.54%). Rent 12.95%, clothing 14.04%, fuel and light 5.25%. Average family size 5.31. NOTE: the University of Missouri guide cited average income as $749 — the primary source says $827.19. The $749 figure is WRONG; this is the correct figure from the report itself. File: bls_v08_0049_1903.pdf (268 pages, text-extractable via pdftotext).
record
151 cigarettes per adult per yearA

Adult per capita cigarette consumption, 1910observed record

cigarettes per adult (≥18 years) per year

Population measuredU.S. adults ≥18 years (NHIS) and total U.S. cigarette consumption (USDA) Source recordCenters for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) · 1994 · Tier A
Full record
Surveillance for Selected Tobacco-Use Behaviors -- United States, 1900-1994
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 1994 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Curator note: From CDC MMWR Surveillance Summary Vol. 43 No. SS-3, Table 1. Cigarette consumption was growing rapidly — up from 54 in 1900. WWI (1917-18) drove a spike: 697 per adult by 1918. Total consumption reached 45.6 billion cigarettes in 1918.
Source note: MMWR Surveillance Summary Vol. 43 No. SS-3. Table 1: per capita cigarette consumption 1900-1994 from USDA Economic Research Service (based on BATF tax data, imports, Census population). Table 2: adult smoking prevalence 1965-1991 from NHIS. Per capita = cigarettes per adult ≥18 per year.
Assumption: The composite family
record
18.6 in 1919, up from 10.0 in 1913A

Food prices, 1919 (index, 1982-84=100)observed record

CPI-U food index (1982-84=100), annual average

Population measuredDepends on series (CPI: all urban consumers; food prices: urban consumers) Source recordU.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics · 2024 · Tier A
Full record
BLS Public Data API v2
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2024 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Curator note: BLS series CUUR0000SAF1. The war nearly doubled the price of eating: 10.0 in 1913 to 18.6 in 1919, +86% in six years. Set against apparel (+143%) and rent (+11%) over the same span, this is the decade's central household fact — the two things a family buys weekly rose steeply while the rent, fixed by lease and slow-moving housing stock, did not. A price index is not a basket; what the family actually ate in the 1910s remains a declared gap.
Source note: Direct API access to BLS time series. Used for: average food prices (APU series), CPI-U (CUUR0000SA0), wage and hours data. API key registered. Food price series (APU) available from ~1970s onward — no 1950 data. Rate limit: 100 queries/day for registered users.
Assumption: The composite family
record

The day

6 exhibits
50.2 male, 53.6 female (white)A

Life expectancy at birth, 1909-11observed record

years

Population measuredVarious national aggregates (depends on table) Source recordU.S. Census Bureau · 1975 · Tier A
Full record
Historical Statistics of the United States, Colonial Times to 1970 (Bicentennial Edition)
U.S. Census Bureau, 1975 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Curator note: From Historical Statistics Vol 1, Series B 116-117 (white population, at birth). The 1910s were devastated by the 1918-19 influenza pandemic, which killed ~675,000 Americans and temporarily reduced life expectancy by ~12 years. Pre-pandemic baseline: 50.2 male, 53.6 female.
Source note: Free on Internet Archive. Contains population, labor, prices, housing, and diffusion series spanning colonial times to 1970. Essential for pre-1940 decades where no dedicated survey exists. Predecessor to the Millennial Edition.
record
$0.260/hr, 56.6 hrs/week, ~$14.72/wkA

Manufacturing production worker wages, 1910observed record

USD, nominal (hourly earnings, weekly hours, implied weekly earnings)

Population measuredProduction workers in manufacturing (national average, payroll data) Source recordU.S. Census Bureau · 1975 · Tier A
Full record
Historical Statistics: Average Hourly Earnings of Manufacturing Production Workers (Series D 766, D 765-767, D 802-804)
U.S. Census Bureau, 1975 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Basis: Hourly rate
Curator note: From Historical Statistics Vol 1, Series D 765-767 (manufacturing production workers). Hourly: $0.260 (26 cents, exact), weekly hours: 56.6, implied weekly earnings: $14.72. By 1915: $0.287/hr, 55.0 hrs/week. These are the pre-WWI wage levels; wartime demand would push wages up sharply by 1917-18.
Source note: Series D 766 (hourly earnings 1890-1914), D 765-767 (manufacturing production workers 1909-1929), D 802-804 (all manufacturing 1919-1948). Pre-FRED CES wage data. Used as the wage anchor for 1900s-1930s rooms (Plan 013). The population skews urban, industrial, male — see the manufacturing-wage-proxy assumption.
Assumption: Values are shown in period money
Assumption: Manufacturing wages as the early-era worker proxy
record
45.6C

Women's weekly unpaid home-production hours, 1910observed record

hours per week, prime-age women (ages 18–64)

Population measuredPrime-age women and men, ages 18–64 (benchmark years 1900–2005); also all-ages per-capita and per-household aggregates Source recordCambridge University Press (Journal of Economic History) · 2009 · Tier C
Full record
Time Spent in Home Production in the Twentieth-Century United States: New Estimates from Old Data
Cambridge University Press (Journal of Economic History), 2009 · source
Confidence: C — Reconstructed from period surveys
Curator note: Ramey (2009) Table 6A, 'All Prime-Age Women' column. Reconstruction from historical time-diary studies (Purnell Act 1920s, Wilson 1929, USDA 1944) linked to AHTUS/BLS surveys from 1965. Includes food prep, house cleaning, clothing care, childcare, purchasing, and household management. Numbers in italics in source = partially extrapolated. Draft version (NBER w13985) has identical values. Splice caveat: Ramey measures women-specific home production ages 18-64; ATUS (2020s room) measures all-adult household activities age 15+ — a concept change that must caveat when plotted together.
Source note: Valerie A. Ramey, JEconHist 69(1), March 2009, pp. 1–47. Reconstruction from historical time-diary studies (Purnell Act studies 1920s, Wilson 1929, USDA 1944) linked to AHTUS/BLS modern surveys. Draft version: NBER Working Paper w13985 (May 2008, 63pp) — data tables are numerically identical to the published version; differences are prose tightening and table reformatting (5→5A/5B, etc.). Tier C (period-survey reconstruction). Key tables: Table 5A (nonemployed women), Table 6A (all women, prime-age), Table 7 (men, prime-age), Table 8A (all ages), Table 3 (component breakdown). Note: Ramey does not use the 1992-94 survey (missing data), so no 1990s benchmark. Splice point to ATUS: Ramey measures women-specific home production ages 18-64; ATUS measures all-adult household activities age 15+ — a concept splice that must caveat (Plan 004 Measure guard).
Assumption: The composite family
record
4.0C

Men's weekly unpaid home-production hours, 1910observed record

hours per week, prime-age men (ages 18–64)

Population measuredPrime-age women and men, ages 18–64 (benchmark years 1900–2005); also all-ages per-capita and per-household aggregates Source recordCambridge University Press (Journal of Economic History) · 2009 · Tier C
Full record
Time Spent in Home Production in the Twentieth-Century United States: New Estimates from Old Data
Cambridge University Press (Journal of Economic History), 2009 · source
Confidence: C — Reconstructed from period surveys
Curator note: Ramey (2009) Table 7, 'All Prime-Age Men' column. Early estimates from Purnell Act studies and Lundberg et al. (1934); 1965+ from AHTUS/BLS. Men's hours rose 13 hrs/week across the century (3.9→16.8), partially offsetting women's decline. Numbers in italics in source = partially extrapolated.
Source note: Valerie A. Ramey, JEconHist 69(1), March 2009, pp. 1–47. Reconstruction from historical time-diary studies (Purnell Act studies 1920s, Wilson 1929, USDA 1944) linked to AHTUS/BLS modern surveys. Draft version: NBER Working Paper w13985 (May 2008, 63pp) — data tables are numerically identical to the published version; differences are prose tightening and table reformatting (5→5A/5B, etc.). Tier C (period-survey reconstruction). Key tables: Table 5A (nonemployed women), Table 6A (all women, prime-age), Table 7 (men, prime-age), Table 8A (all ages), Table 3 (component breakdown). Note: Ramey does not use the 1992-94 survey (missing data), so no 1990s benchmark. Splice point to ATUS: Ramey measures women-specific home production ages 18-64; ATUS measures all-adult household activities age 15+ — a concept splice that must caveat (Plan 004 Measure guard).
Assumption: The composite family
record
~10.7%A

Married women's labor force participation, 1910observed record

% of married women (husband present) in the civilian labor force

Population measuredVarious national aggregates (depends on table) Source recordU.S. Census Bureau · 1975 · Tier A
Full record
Historical Statistics of the United States, Colonial Times to 1970 (Bicentennial Edition)
U.S. Census Bureau, 1975 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Curator note: From Historical Statistics Vol 1, Series D 49-62. The 1910 census recorded ~10.7% — nearly double the 1900 figure — but Historical Statistics notes 1910 data is 'not comparable with other censuses' due to different enumerator instructions. The true rate may have been lower. Total female LFPR was 25.4%. Still a predominantly single-earner era.
Source note: Free on Internet Archive. Contains population, labor, prices, housing, and diffusion series spanning colonial times to 1970. Essential for pre-1940 decades where no dedicated survey exists. Predecessor to the Millennial Edition.
Assumption: The composite family
record
Men: 25.1, Women: 21.6A

Median age at first marriage, 1910observed record

years (median age at first marriage)

Population measuredU.S. civilian noninstitutionalized population (CPS/decennial census) Source recordU.S. Census Bureau · 2023 · Tier A
Full record
Census Historical Table MS-2: Median Age at First Marriage
U.S. Census Bureau, 2023 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Curator note: From Census Table MS-2. Decennial census. The age gap was narrowing slightly: 3.5 years vs 4.0 in 1900. WWI would temporarily disrupt marriage patterns.
Source note: Table MS-2: Median age at first marriage by sex, 1890 to present. Decennial census data 1890-2000; CPS data for intervening years and 2010+. File: ms2-median-age-first-marriage.xls. The median age at first marriage declined from ~26 (men) / ~22 (women) in 1890 to a mid-century low of ~22.5 / 20.3 in 1956, then rose steadily to ~30+ / ~28+ by 2023.
record

What had arrived

2 exhibits
~13 per 1,000 population (1915)A

Telephone diffusion, 1910sobserved record

telephones per 1,000 population

Population measuredVarious national aggregates (depends on table) Source recordU.S. Census Bureau · 1975 · Tier A
Full record
Historical Statistics of the United States, Colonial Times to 1970 (Bicentennial Edition)
U.S. Census Bureau, 1975 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Curator note: From Historical Statistics Vol 2, Series R 1-2. In 1915: ~13 per 1,000 population (~5.5 million total phones). Household percentage not directly reported until 1944, but estimated at well under 10% of households. The Bell System was expanding but telephone remained a business and upper-class amenity.
Source note: Free on Internet Archive. Contains population, labor, prices, housing, and diffusion series spanning colonial times to 1970. Essential for pre-1940 decades where no dedicated survey exists. Predecessor to the Millennial Edition.
record
Electricity ~5-10% of homes (urban only). Radio not yet commercial. Automobile <2%.C

Electricity, radio, automobileobserved record

n/a

Population measuredVarious national aggregates (depends on table) Source recordU.S. Census Bureau · 1975 · Tier C
Full record
Historical Statistics of the United States, Colonial Times to 1970 (Bicentennial Edition)
U.S. Census Bureau, 1975 · source
Confidence: C — Reconstructed from period surveys
Curator note: Historical Statistics does not track household electrification directly until the 1940 Census. Urban electrification was growing rapidly (Edison's Pearl Street station opened 1882); by 1910, most city homes had electric lighting. Rural homes were almost entirely unelectrified. Commercial radio broadcasting began 1920 (KDKA Pittsburgh). Automobile registrations were growing but still under 2% of households.
Source note: Free on Internet Archive. Contains population, labor, prices, housing, and diffusion series spanning colonial times to 1970. Essential for pre-1940 decades where no dedicated survey exists. Predecessor to the Millennial Edition.
record

A day's work buys

2 exhibits
no reliable record accessible onlineD

Affordability comparisons, 1910sdocumented gap

n/a

Population measuredVarious national aggregates (depends on table) Source recordU.S. Census Bureau · 1975 · Tier D
Full record
Historical Statistics of the United States, Colonial Times to 1970 (Bicentennial Edition)
U.S. Census Bureau, 1975 · source
Confidence: D — Scholarly estimate
Curator note: Without a median family income figure, affordability comparisons cannot be computed. Manufacturing wages ($0.26/hr, ~$765/yr) provide a wage anchor, but without expenditure data, the purchasing-power comparison is incomplete.
Source note: Free on Internet Archive. Contains population, labor, prices, housing, and diffusion series spanning colonial times to 1970. Essential for pre-1940 decades where no dedicated survey exists. Predecessor to the Millennial Edition.
record
~$1,188 (average wholesale, computed from factory sales)A

Average new car price, 1910observed record

USD, nominal (wholesale value per passenger car)

Population measuredVarious national aggregates (depends on table) Source recordU.S. Census Bureau · 1975 · Tier A
Full record
Historical Statistics of the United States, Colonial Times to 1970 (Bicentennial Edition)
U.S. Census Bureau, 1975 · source
Confidence: A — Official series
Basis: One-time price
Affordability anchors: Production workers in manufacturing (national average, payroll data)
Denominators measure: hours axis: average hourly earnings
Curator note: Computed from Historical Statistics of the United States, Colonial Times to 1970, Part 2, p.716, Series Q 148-162 (source: Automobile Manufacturers Association, Automobile Facts and Figures, 27th ed., 1946-47). 1910: 181,000 passenger cars sold at $215 million wholesale value = ~$1,188 average per car. This is wholesale (factory) value; retail/transaction price would be higher (dealer markup). The source notes 'beginning 1937, standard equipment is included in the value estimate.' Population: all US factory sales of passenger cars.
Source note: Free on Internet Archive. Contains population, labor, prices, housing, and diffusion series spanning colonial times to 1970. Essential for pre-1940 decades where no dedicated survey exists. Predecessor to the Millennial Edition.
Assumption: Values are shown in period money
Computed affordability

≈ 4,569 hours of work

Large ratio: inspect the wage population and anchor years in provenance before reading this as one household's timeline.

record

See this metric across all decades →

Confidence & flags

A — official statistical series
B — official microdata, computed by this project
C — reconstructed from period surveys
D — scholarly estimate
Gap — no reliable record; shown as the gap it is

Reading the atlas

Provenance is in the scan-line: every exhibit's row names its value, confidence tier, the population actually measured, and the source record. Chart points and stage glyphs open the same record.

Rising series draw in petrol, falling in ember. Absent technology isn't drawn — a bare house says more than ghosts.